Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add reproduction for HMR moving / renaming files. #57230

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

leerob
Copy link
Member

@leerob leerob commented Oct 23, 2023

Pairing with @timneutkens. Passes with webpack, fails with Turbopack.

TURBOPACK=1 pn testonly-dev test/development/app-dir/hmr-move-file

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Oct 23, 2023

Tests Passed

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Oct 23, 2023

Stats from current PR

Default Build
General
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
buildDuration 13s 13s N/A
buildDurationCached 7.3s 6.2s N/A
nodeModulesSize 199 MB 199 MB
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 435ms 434ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
193.HASH.js gzip 181 B 182 B N/A
3f784ff6-HASH.js gzip 53.3 kB 53.3 kB N/A
433-HASH.js gzip 28.6 kB 28.6 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 45.2 kB 45.2 kB
main-app-HASH.js gzip 239 B 242 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 31.7 kB 31.8 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.7 kB 1.7 kB N/A
Overall change 45.2 kB 45.2 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 194 B 195 B N/A
_error-HASH.js gzip 183 B 181 B N/A
amp-HASH.js gzip 504 B 502 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 321 B 321 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.5 kB 2.5 kB N/A
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 255 B 253 B N/A
head-HASH.js gzip 350 B 349 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 369 B 369 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.28 kB 4.28 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 255 B 256 B N/A
link-HASH.js gzip 2.61 kB 2.61 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 312 B 311 B N/A
script-HASH.js gzip 385 B 383 B N/A
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 307 B 308 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.4 kB 3.4 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 483 B 484 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
index.html gzip 527 B 527 B
link.html gzip 541 B 539 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 523 B 522 B N/A
Overall change 527 B 527 B
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 93.8 kB 93.8 kB N/A
page.js gzip 148 kB 148 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 623 B 624 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 151 B 151 B
middleware.js gzip 37.4 kB 37.4 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 1.92 kB 1.92 kB
Overall change 2.07 kB 2.07 kB
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js hmr-failing-test Change
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 169 kB 169 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 95.2 kB 95.2 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 95.8 kB 95.8 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 90.4 kB 90.4 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 142 kB 142 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 89.8 kB 89.8 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 24.1 kB 24.1 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 16.7 kB 16.7 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 16.7 kB 16.7 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 16.3 kB 16.3 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 23.5 kB 23.5 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 16.3 kB 16.3 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.38 kB 9.38 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 9.65 kB 9.65 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.37 kB 9.37 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 22.5 kB 22.5 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 49.5 kB 49.5 kB
Overall change 939 kB 939 kB
Commit: 8adc56f

@sokra sokra merged commit fb73c3a into canary Jan 9, 2024
64 of 69 checks passed
@sokra sokra deleted the hmr-failing-test branch January 9, 2024 18:02
@timneutkens timneutkens mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2024
timneutkens added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2024
## What?

As @leerob and I found in-person when opening #57230 the `hasRedBox()`
helper was incorrectly passing when it shouldn't pass in both the true
and false case.

This PR uses a different approach by waiting 7 seconds before checking,
this leaves enough room for HMR / reloads to apply, it doesn't
meaningfully slow down the test suite and increases reliability of the
check as you can see below in the tests that were previously passing
that are no longer passing.

I've moved these to skipped tests for landing this PR as I want to avoid
further issues being introduced while we fix them. @huozhi will
investigate these next week 👍

Failing tests that are temporarily skipped:
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-fa7d7c8c40914005c138d852eaf6a69ac0df51ec77bec548cbc5f0bfbdc8ebc5R25
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-6f9f7dc131416cb17938311939a56d8c0e685a8fe6e8fc0cf5cd04939c74f388R41
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-439830e340a320c56645e9d00aaf0fd0b492ddb90b6d7f9db89458ccc5158eb7R8
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-62938bf5cd4d84f96dde8b6bcb2c8e18099e6dfca269c4302229b79175c0250cR18
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9


<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Adding or Updating Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->


Closes NEXT-2059
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants