-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 795
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Split interactive docs section into subpages #3561
Conversation
To make it easier to navigate instead of having one giant page.
The parts about performance and JupyterChart are under the Large Datasets section, so it seems natural that the part about interactivity would go together with the other interactive parts of the library.
I think this looks more pleasing as content without a right-side ToC stretches wider across the page.
FYI I was about to try building the docs, but needed this merged #3560 |
sphinx shouting at me
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this makes for a much easier read thanks @joelostblom!
I was already on-board with the idea, so probably best to have approval from another maintainer.
index.rst
is the only page I think needs revisiting, feel free to dismiss the suggestions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't read through all changes but I'm also all onboard splitting the interactive docs! Looks much better :) Thanks!
Co-authored-by: Dan Redding <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking much better thanks again @joelostblom
I'll approve this now.
You can drop the concepts suggestion if it doesn't seem right, but please commit the spellcheck one
Co-authored-by: Dan Redding <[email protected]>
Thank you! Merging |
As discussed in #3500 with @dangotbanned
New look: