Backport PR #2664 to release/v1.7 for Refactor grpc/status.withDetails function for performance #2668
Conversation
Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]>
Deploying vald with
|
| Latest commit: |
c3e62a7
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://38259509.vald.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://backport-release-v1-7-refact-osa4.vald.pages.dev |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves significant updates to the project repository, including the addition of new files and directories, modifications to existing files, and enhancements to testing capabilities. Key changes include the introduction of unit tests across various components, updates to Go and dependency versions, and modifications to issue templates. Additionally, there are changes in the installation processes for tools and libraries, along with the introduction of a new internal package for hostname retrieval. The overall structure of the repository is maintained while focusing on improving functionality and test coverage. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 40
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (34)
pkg/gateway/mirror/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
Line range hint
93-101: Consider enhancing error handling inWithValdAddrfunction.While reviewing the file, I noticed that the
WithValdAddrfunction has a basic error check. Consider enhancing the error handling to provide more context or validate the address format. For example:func WithValdAddr(addr string) Option { return func(s *server) error { if addr == "" { return errors.NewErrCriticalOption("valdAddr", "address cannot be empty") } if _, _, err := net.SplitHostPort(addr); err != nil { return errors.NewErrCriticalOption("valdAddr", fmt.Sprintf("invalid address format: %v", err)) } s.vAddr = addr return nil } }This suggestion adds more robust validation and provides clearer error messages.
pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
Line range hint
43-51: Consider improving error handling inWithNamefunction.While the change in the
ospackage import doesn't directly affect theWithNamefunction, this might be a good opportunity to improve its error handling. Currently, it logs a warning ifos.Hostname()returns an error, but still uses the potentially emptynamevariable.Consider the following improvements:
- Provide a fallback name if
os.Hostname()fails.- Optionally, propagate the error to the caller for better error handling.
Here's a suggested implementation:
WithName(func() string { name, err := os.Hostname() if err != nil { log.Warn("failed to get hostname:", err) return "unknown-host" // Fallback name } return name }()),This change ensures that even if
os.Hostname()fails, a valid name is always provided.internal/os/hostname_test.go (1)
39-71: Implement actual test cases.The test cases slice is currently empty with TODO placeholders. To ensure comprehensive testing of the
Hostnamefunction, consider implementing the following test cases:
- A test case for successful hostname retrieval.
- A test case simulating an error condition (if possible to simulate).
- A test case with a mocked hostname for consistent testing across different environments.
Here's an example of how you might implement these test cases:
tests := []test{ { name: "successful_hostname_retrieval", want: want{ wantHn: "", // Leave empty to match any non-empty hostname err: nil, }, checkFunc: func(w want, gotHn string, err error) error { if err != nil { return errors.Errorf("expected no error, got: %v", err) } if gotHn == "" { return errors.New("expected non-empty hostname") } return nil }, }, { name: "simulated_error_condition", want: want{ wantHn: "", err: errors.New("simulated error"), }, beforeFunc: func(t *testing.T) { // Set up the environment to simulate an error // This might involve mocking the OS hostname function }, afterFunc: func(t *testing.T) { // Clean up the mocked environment }, }, { name: "mocked_hostname", want: want{ wantHn: "mocked-hostname", err: nil, }, beforeFunc: func(t *testing.T) { // Set up the environment with a mocked hostname t.Setenv("HOSTNAME", "mocked-hostname") }, }, }Remember to adjust these test cases based on the actual implementation of the
Hostnamefunction and the specific scenarios you want to test.Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these test cases?
internal/net/grpc/codes/codes_test.go (1)
39-76: Implement actual test cases and use a consistent style.The file currently contains placeholder sections for test cases, which is a good starting point. However, to make this test file functional and maintainable:
Replace the placeholders with actual test cases that cover various scenarios for the
ToStringfunction.Choose a consistent style for defining test cases. The current placeholders show two different styles:
- Inline definition
- Function returning a test case
It's recommended to use the inline definition style for simplicity and readability unless there's a specific need for the function style.
Ensure that the test cases cover both normal and edge cases for the
ToStringfunction.Example of a potential test case:
{ name: "test_OK", args: args{ c: OK, }, want: want{ want: "OK", }, checkFunc: defaultCheckFunc, },Would you like help in drafting a set of comprehensive test cases for the
ToStringfunction?dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1)
48-48: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
CARGO_HOMEenvironment variable is a good practice for Rust development environments. It ensures that Cargo (Rust's package manager) has a consistent location for its files and caches.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this variable for future maintainers:
+# Set Cargo home directory for Rust package management ENV CARGO_HOME=${RUST_HOME}/cargointernal/net/http/json/json.go (2)
Line range hint
140-168: Consider optimizingErrorHandlerfunctionWhile not directly related to the import change, the
ErrorHandlerfunction could be optimized:
- The function always attempts to decode the request body, even for errors that might not be related to the request body. This could lead to unnecessary processing and potential errors.
- The error from
json.Decodeis logged but not handled, which might hide important information.Consider refactoring this function to:
- Only decode the request body when necessary.
- Handle the
json.Decodeerror more gracefully, possibly including it in the error response.Here's a potential optimization:
func ErrorHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, msg string, code int, err error) error { data := RFC7807Error{ Type: r.RequestURI, Title: msg, Status: code, Error: err.Error(), } var decodeErr error data.Instance, decodeErr = os.Hostname() if decodeErr != nil { log.Error(decodeErr) } body := make(map[string]any) if r.Body != nil && r.ContentLength > 0 { decodeErr = json.Decode(r.Body, &body) if decodeErr != nil { log.Error(decodeErr) body["decodeError"] = decodeErr.Error() } } data.Detail, decodeErr = dump.Request(nil, body, r) if decodeErr != nil { log.Error(decodeErr) } // Rest of the function remains the same ... }
Line range hint
170-192: Consider replacinghttp.DefaultClientinRequestfunctionThe
Requestfunction useshttp.DefaultClient, which might not be ideal for production use. The default client has no timeout set, which could lead to resource leaks or long-running requests.Consider creating a custom HTTP client with appropriate timeout and other settings. Here's a suggestion:
var httpClient = &http.Client{ Timeout: 30 * time.Second, // Add other settings as needed } func Request(ctx context.Context, method, url string, payload, data any) error { req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, method, url, nil) if err != nil { return err } if payload != nil && method != http.MethodGet { if err := EncodeRequest(req, payload, rest.ApplicationJSON, rest.CharsetUTF8); err != nil { return err } } resp, err := httpClient.Do(req) if err != nil { return err } return DecodeResponse(resp, data) }This change ensures that requests have a timeout and allows for easier customization of the HTTP client in the future.
internal/net/grpc/errdetails/errdetails_test.go (2)
115-209: Implement and uncomment theTestDetail_MarshalJSONfunctionThe
TestDetail_MarshalJSONfunction is well-structured for a table-driven test, but it's currently commented out and lacks test cases. Consider the following suggestions:
- Uncomment the entire function (lines 115-209).
- Implement test cases to cover various scenarios for the
MarshalJSONmethod of theDetailtype.- Consider using a test helper function to create
Detailinstances for better readability and maintainability.- Add a test case for error handling to ensure proper behavior when marshaling fails.
Here's a sample test case to get you started:
{ name: "valid_detail", fields: fields{ TypeURL: "type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.ErrorInfo", Message: &errdetails.ErrorInfo{ Reason: "TEST_REASON", Domain: "TEST_DOMAIN", }, }, want: want{ wantBody: []byte(`{"type_url":"type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.ErrorInfo","value":{"reason":"TEST_REASON","domain":"TEST_DOMAIN"}}`), err: nil, }, },Would you like me to generate more test cases or provide further assistance in implementing this test function?
Line range hint
27-113: Implement test cases for all test functions in the fileSeveral test functions in this file are currently unimplemented, including:
Test_decodeDetailsTestSerializeTestAnyToErrorDetailTestDebugInfoFromInfoDetailTo ensure comprehensive test coverage for the
errdetailspackage, consider the following suggestions:
- Prioritize the implementation of these test functions based on the complexity and importance of the functions they're testing.
- Use a consistent testing style across all functions, similar to the table-driven approach used in
TestDetail_MarshalJSON.- Ensure that each test function covers various scenarios, including edge cases and error conditions.
- Consider using test coverage tools to identify any remaining untested code paths after implementing these tests.
Would you like assistance in creating a testing plan or implementing test cases for any of these functions?
internal/errors/usearch_test.go (1)
18-101: Implement test cases for TestNewUsearchErrorThe structure for
TestNewUsearchErroris well-designed, but it lacks actual test cases. Consider the following suggestions:
- Uncomment the entire function.
- Implement at least two test cases:
- A case with a non-empty message to verify correct error creation.
- A case with an empty message to ensure proper handling.
- Ensure that the
checkFuncproperly compares the created error with the expected error.Example test case:
{ name: "non_empty_message", args: args{ msg: "test error message", }, want: want{ err: &UsearchError{Msg: "test error message"}, }, checkFunc: defaultCheckFunc, },Would you like assistance in generating more comprehensive test cases?
internal/net/grpc/interceptor/server/logging/accesslog_test.go (2)
Line range hint
139-479: Implement tests for all commented-out test functions.There are several test functions in this file that are commented out and lack implemented test cases:
TestAccessLogInterceptorTestAccessLogStreamInterceptorTest_parseMethodTo ensure proper test coverage and maintain code quality, it's crucial to implement these tests. Please uncomment these functions and add meaningful test cases for each. This will help catch potential bugs, ensure correct behavior of the interceptors and utility functions, and make the codebase more robust.
Consider the following steps for each function:
- Uncomment the entire function.
- Implement diverse test cases covering various scenarios, including edge cases and error conditions.
- Ensure that the
checkFuncfor each test appropriately validates the expected output.Would you like assistance in outlining the structure for these test cases or generating sample test scenarios for any of these functions?
Line range hint
1-479: Overall: Implement and activate all test functions in this file.This test file contains well-structured but inactive test functions for various components of the
loggingpackage. To improve the overall quality and reliability of the codebase, it's crucial to:
- Uncomment and implement all test functions in this file.
- Add diverse and meaningful test cases for each function, covering various scenarios including edge cases and error conditions.
- Ensure that all tests are running and passing before merging this PR.
Implementing these tests will significantly improve the test coverage of the
loggingpackage, helping to catch potential bugs early and ensure the correct behavior of the access logging functionality in the gRPC interceptors.Consider setting up a CI/CD pipeline that enforces a minimum test coverage threshold to prevent merging PRs with insufficient test coverage in the future.
pkg/gateway/mirror/service/gateway_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-824: Consider implementing TODO test casesThe file contains numerous TODO comments and placeholder test cases. While not directly related to the current changes, it would be beneficial to implement these tests in the future to improve test coverage and ensure the robustness of the gateway service.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these TODO test cases?
go.mod (1)
Line range hint
1-532: Summary of changes and recommendationsThis update includes a minor Go version update (1.23.1 to 1.23.2) and numerous dependency updates. While these changes are likely to bring improvements and bug fixes, it's crucial to ensure they don't introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues.
Recommendations:
- Run all tests and build the project to verify compatibility with the new Go version and updated dependencies.
- Review the changelogs of the updated dependencies, especially for major version changes.
- Pay special attention to the usage of the newly added
github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golangdependency.- If any issues are discovered during testing, consider updating dependencies one at a time to isolate the problem.
- Update your CI/CD pipelines to use Go 1.23.2 if necessary.
Consider implementing a dependency update strategy that includes regular reviews of dependency changelogs and a process for testing and rolling out updates incrementally to minimize the risk of introducing breaking changes.
internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.go (3)
Line range hint
4-4: Consider addressing the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates that tests need to be added. It's important to ensure comprehensive test coverage for the
usearchpackage.Would you like assistance in generating additional test cases or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
5-351: Consider adding more diverse test cases.While the existing test cases cover basic functionality, consider adding more edge cases and error scenarios to improve test coverage. For example:
- Test with empty input vectors
- Test with very large input vectors
- Test with invalid input (e.g., mismatched dimensions)
- Test concurrent access if applicable
Line range hint
1-1679: Improve overall test coverage and follow Go best practices.
- Implement tests for all exported functions in the
usearchpackage to ensure comprehensive coverage.- Consider using subtests for better organization of test cases within each test function.
- Ensure that error cases are thoroughly tested.
- Use
t.Parallel()judiciously, considering potential resource conflicts.- Consider adding benchmarks for performance-critical functions.
- Use
go test -raceto check for race conditions in concurrent code.Following these practices will improve the overall quality and reliability of the test suite.
pkg/agent/core/ngt/service/ngt_test.go (14)
Line range hint
2152-2425: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_prepareFolders.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
prepareFoldersmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful folder preparation
- Preparation with existing folders
- Preparation with insufficient permissions
- Error scenarios during folder creation
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_folder_preparation", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), }, fields: fields{ path: "/tmp/test_path", // Set other necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
2434-2721: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_load.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
loadmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful loading of NGT index
- Loading with invalid path
- Loading with various core.Option configurations
- Error scenarios during loading
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_load", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), path: "/valid/path", opts: []core.Option{ // Add relevant options }, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
2722-3003: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_backupBroken.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
backupBrokenmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful backup of broken index
- Backup with no broken index
- Backup with insufficient permissions
- Error scenarios during backup process
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_backup", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), }, fields: fields{ path: "/valid/path", brokenPath: "/valid/broken/path", // Set other necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
3004-3291: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_rebuild.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
rebuildmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful rebuild of NGT index
- Rebuild with invalid path
- Rebuild with various core.Option configurations
- Error scenarios during rebuild process
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_rebuild", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), path: "/valid/path", opts: []core.Option{ // Add relevant options }, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
3292-3573: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_initNGT.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
initNGTmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful initialization of NGT
- Initialization with various core.Option configurations
- Error scenarios during initialization
- Edge cases (e.g., extreme values for configuration options)
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_init", args: args{ opts: []core.Option{ // Add relevant options }, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
3574-3861: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_loadKVS.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
loadKVSmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful loading of KVS
- Loading with invalid path
- Loading with different timeout values
- Error scenarios during KVS loading
- Context cancellation during loading
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_kvs_load", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), path: "/valid/path", timeout: 5 * time.Second, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
3862-4143: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_Start.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
Startmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful start of the NGT service
- Start with different context scenarios (e.g., cancelled context, timeout context)
- Error scenarios during start process
- Edge cases related to the NGT configuration
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_start", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ want: make(chan error), }, checkFunc: func(w want, got <-chan error) error { select { case err := <-got: if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("expected nil error, got %v", err) } case <-time.After(5 * time.Second): return fmt.Errorf("timeout waiting for start") } return nil }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Given that the
Startmethod appears to be asynchronous (returning a channel), ensure that the test cases properly handle this asynchronous behavior. Consider using goroutines and select statements in your test cases to properly test the asynchronous nature of the method.
Line range hint
4144-4441: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_Search.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
Searchmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful search with various input vectors
- Search with different size, epsilon, and radius parameters
- Search with edge case inputs (e.g., empty vector, very large vector)
- Error scenarios during search process
- Context cancellation during search
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_search", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), vec: []float32{0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, size: 10, epsilon: 0.01, radius: -1, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ wantRes: &payload.Search_Response{ // Set expected response }, err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
4442-4743: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_SearchByID.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
SearchByIDmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful search by ID with various input UUIDs
- Search with different size, epsilon, and radius parameters
- Search with non-existent UUID
- Error scenarios during search process
- Context cancellation during search
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_search_by_id", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), uuid: "test-uuid-1", size: 10, epsilon: 0.01, radius: -1, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ wantVec: []float32{0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, wantDst: &payload.Search_Response{ // Set expected response }, err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
4744-5035: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_LinearSearch.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
LinearSearchmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful linear search with various input vectors
- Search with different size parameters
- Search with edge case inputs (e.g., empty vector, very large vector)
- Error scenarios during linear search process
- Context cancellation during search
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_linear_search", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), vec: []float32{0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, size: 10, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ wantRes: &payload.Search_Response{ // Set expected response }, err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
5036-5331: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_LinearSearchByID.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
LinearSearchByIDmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful linear search by ID with various input UUIDs
- Search with different size parameters
- Search with non-existent UUID
- Error scenarios during linear search process
- Context cancellation during search
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_linear_search_by_id", args: args{ ctx: context.Background(), uuid: "test-uuid-1", size: 10, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ wantVec: []float32{0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, wantDst: &payload.Search_Response{ // Set expected response }, err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
5332-5616: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_Insert.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
Insertmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful insertion of a vector with a new UUID
- Insertion attempt with an existing UUID
- Insertion with edge case inputs (e.g., empty vector, very large vector)
- Error scenarios during insertion process
- Insertion with invalid UUID format
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_insert", args: args{ uuid: "test-uuid-1", vec: []float32{0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
5617-5904: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_InsertWithTime.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
InsertWithTimemethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful insertion of a vector with a new UUID and timestamp
- Insertion attempt with an existing UUID
- Insertion with edge case inputs (e.g., empty vector, very large vector)
- Error scenarios during insertion process
- Insertion with invalid UUID format
- Insertion with various timestamp values (past, present, future)
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_insert_with_time", args: args{ uuid: "test-uuid-1", vec: []float32{0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, t: time.Now().UnixNano(), }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Line range hint
5905-6195: Implement test cases forTest_ngt_insert.The structure of the test function is well-designed, using table-driven tests which is a good practice. However, the test cases are currently commented out and not implemented. To ensure proper testing of the
insertmethod, please implement concrete test cases covering various scenarios.Consider adding test cases that cover:
- Successful insertion of a vector with a new UUID, timestamp, and validation
- Insertion attempt with an existing UUID
- Insertion with edge case inputs (e.g., empty vector, very large vector)
- Error scenarios during insertion process
- Insertion with invalid UUID format
- Insertion with various timestamp values (past, present, future)
- Insertion with validation enabled and disabled
Example of adding a test case:
{ name: "successful_insert_with_validation", args: args{ uuid: "test-uuid-1", vec: []float32{0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, t: time.Now().UnixNano(), validation: true, }, fields: fields{ // Set necessary fields }, want: want{ err: nil, }, },The overall structure of the test function is well-designed and follows Go testing best practices.
Ensure to include test cases that specifically test the behavior when the
validationparameter is set totrueandfalse. This will help verify that the validation logic is working correctlyinternal/os/hostname.go (1)
45-45: Consider using a more standard separator instrings.JoinIn the
strings.Join(ips, ",\t"), the separator",\t"includes a tab character. If the intention is to separate IP addresses with a comma and space, consider using", "instead for better readability.internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (1)
162-173: Emptydefaultcase inswitchstatement can be omittedThe
defaultcase in theswitchstatement is empty and unnecessary. Removing it can simplify the code without altering functionality.Apply this diff to remove the empty
defaultcase:switch st.Code() { case codes.Aborted, codes.Canceled, codes.DeadlineExceeded, codes.AlreadyExists, codes.NotFound, codes.OK, codes.Unimplemented: return st, st.Message(), st.Err() - default: - } + }internal/net/grpc/client_test.go (1)
2184-2367: Implement test cases for Test_gRPCClient_SetDisableResolveDNSAddrThe test function
Test_gRPCClient_SetDisableResolveDNSAddris currently incomplete and contains TODO comments. Implementing these test cases will ensure that theSetDisableResolveDNSAddrmethod is properly tested.Would you like assistance in generating the test cases for this function?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
example/client/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumhack/actions/gen/main_test.gois excluded by!**/gen/**rust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (35)
- .gitfiles (6 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md (1 hunks)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
- Makefile.d/tools.mk (2 hunks)
- dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- example/client/go.mod (3 hunks)
- example/client/go.mod.default (1 hunks)
- go.mod (15 hunks)
- hack/go.mod.default (1 hunks)
- internal/core/algorithm/usearch/option_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/core/algorithm/usearch/usearch_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/errors/usearch_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/client_test.go (68 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/codes/codes_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/errdetails/errdetails_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/interceptor/server/logging/accesslog_test.go (1 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (16 hunks)
- internal/net/grpc/status/status_test.go (2 hunks)
- internal/net/http/json/json.go (1 hunks)
- internal/os/hostname.go (1 hunks)
- internal/os/hostname_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/faiss/handler/grpc/option.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/option.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/service/ngt_test.go (93 hunks)
- pkg/discoverer/k8s/handler/grpc/option.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/gateway/filter/handler/grpc/option.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/option.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/gateway/mirror/handler/grpc/option.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/gateway/mirror/service/gateway_test.go (2 hunks)
- versions/CMAKE_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/GO_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/HDF5_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/JAEGER_OPERATOR_VERSION (1 hunks)
- versions/actions/CODECOV_CODECOV_ACTION (1 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/service/ngt_test.go: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
- example/client/go.mod.default
- hack/go.mod.default
- versions/CMAKE_VERSION
- versions/GO_VERSION
- versions/HDF5_VERSION
- versions/JAEGER_OPERATOR_VERSION
- versions/actions/CODECOV_CODECOV_ACTION
🔇 Additional comments (35)
pkg/discoverer/k8s/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
Line range hint
1-71: Overall assessment: Minor change with potential performance implicationsThe change in this file is limited to updating the import statement for the
ospackage. While this change appears minor, it could be part of a broader effort to improve performance as mentioned in the PR objectives. The rest of the file remains unchanged and maintains its original functionality.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please verify that all tests related to this package still pass after this modification.
example/client/go.mod (3)
17-17: LGTM: gRPC version updateUpdating google.golang.org/grpc to v1.67.1 is a good practice. This patch version update likely includes bug fixes and minor improvements that can enhance the stability and security of your gRPC implementation.
Line range hint
1-42: Verify alignment with PR objectives and conduct thorough testingThe changes in this file primarily consist of dependency updates, which is generally good practice for maintaining security and stability. However, there are a few points that need attention:
- The Go version specified is incorrect and needs to be updated to a valid version.
- There's a potential version mismatch in the genproto packages that should be resolved.
Additionally, given that the PR objectives mention backporting changes for performance improvements, it's important to verify that these dependency updates contribute to or at least don't hinder those performance goals.
Please ensure that:
- These changes align with the performance improvements mentioned in the PR objectives.
- Comprehensive testing is performed to verify that the dependency updates don't introduce any regressions or compatibility issues.
Consider running performance benchmarks before and after these changes to quantify any impact on the system's performance.
14-16: Verify compatibility with updated google.golang.org/genproto packagesThe updates to google.golang.org/genproto and its subpackages appear to be in line with keeping dependencies up-to-date. However, it's important to ensure that these changes don't introduce any breaking changes to the project.
Please run the following command to check for any compatibility issues:
This will ensure that all dependencies are correctly resolved and that the project still builds successfully with these updates.
pkg/gateway/mirror/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
22-22: Approve the import change with a suggestion for verification.The change from the standard
ospackage togithub.com/vdaas/vald/internal/oslooks good. This custom package likely provides Vald-specific functionality or error handling. However, to ensure compatibility and proper implementation, please verify that:
- The custom
ospackage fully implements theHostname()function with the same signature and behavior as the standard library.- Any additional error handling or Vald-specific logic in the custom
os.Hostname()function is intentional and documented.To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, let's check for other usages of the
ospackage in the codebase:This script will help identify if there are any inconsistencies in the usage of the
ospackage across the codebase.✅ Verification successful
Verified the replacement of the standard
ospackage withgithub.com/vdaas/vald/internal/osacross the codebase. All usages ofos.Hostname()now correctly reference the internal package without any instances of the standardospackage remaining.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of the os package in the codebase # Search for imports of the standard os package echo "Searching for standard os package imports:" rg --type go 'import\s+(\([^)]*\)\s*)?([^()\s]*\s+)?"os"' # Search for imports of the custom Vald os package echo "Searching for custom Vald os package imports:" rg --type go 'import\s+(\([^)]*\)\s*)?([^()\s]*\s+)?"github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os"' # Search for usages of os.Hostname() echo "Searching for usages of os.Hostname():" rg --type go 'os\.Hostname\(\)'Length of output: 1112
pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Summary of the reviewThe change to use an internal
ospackage instead of the standard library is minimal but potentially impactful. We've approved this change with suggestions for verification and documentation updates. Additionally, we've recommended an improvement to the error handling in theWithNamefunction.Overall, the changes look good, but please ensure thorough testing of the new
ospackage implementation, especially theHostname()function, to maintain compatibility with the standard library.pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
26-26: Verify compatibility of custom 'os' package and document the change.The import statement has been changed from the standard "os" package to a custom implementation
"github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os". This change affects the usage ofos.Hostname()in thedefaultOptionsvariable.
- Please verify that the custom
ospackage maintains the same interface and behavior as the standard library, particularly for theHostname()function.- Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind using a custom
ospackage instead of the standard library. This will help future maintainers understand the decision.To ensure compatibility, please run the following script:
This script will help verify that the
Hostname()function in the custom package has the same signature and a similar implementation to the standard library.pkg/agent/core/faiss/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
Line range hint
1-102: Approve overall structure and implementationThe overall structure and implementation of the
option.gofile appear to be well-designed and appropriate for configuring a gRPC server. The various options provided (WithIP, WithName, WithFaiss, WithStreamConcurrency, WithErrGroup) are implemented consistently and include proper error checking.The use of functional options pattern is a good choice for configuring the server, allowing for flexible and extensible configuration.
internal/os/hostname_test.go (1)
1-14: LGTM: License and package declaration are correct.The Apache License 2.0 header is properly included, and the package name
osmatches the directory structure.internal/net/grpc/codes/codes_test.go (1)
1-14: LGTM: Proper file header and package declaration.The file starts with the correct copyright notice, license information, and package declaration. This follows best practices for Go files in the project.
pkg/gateway/filter/handler/grpc/option.go (1)
28-28: LGTM: Import change looks good, but verify internal package functionality.The change from the standard
ospackage togithub.com/vdaas/vald/internal/osis appropriate. This likely provides custom implementations or wrappers for OS-related functions, which can offer better control or consistency across the project.To ensure the internal OS package provides the same functionality as the standard library, please run the following verification:
This script will help verify that the
Hostnamefunction is properly implemented in the internal package.dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Overall, the change looks good. Verify Rust-related operations.The addition of the
CARGO_HOMEenvironment variable is consistent with the existing Rust configuration in this Dockerfile. It doesn't introduce any conflicts with other parts of the file and should improve the management of Rust packages.To ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact any Rust-related operations, please run the following verification script:
This script will build the Docker image and run a test command to verify that Rust and Cargo are correctly set up with the new
CARGO_HOMEconfiguration.internal/net/http/json/json.go (2)
Line range hint
147-147: Verify behavior of customos.Hostname()functionThe
ErrorHandlerfunction usesos.Hostname(), which now refers to the custom implementation fromgithub.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os. It's crucial to ensure that this custom implementation behaves identically to the standard library version to maintain consistency and avoid unexpected behavior.Please confirm:
- Does the custom
os.Hostname()function return the same result as the standard library version?- Are there any edge cases or error handling differences between the custom and standard implementations?
To verify the behavior, run:
30-30: Verify customospackage compatibility and rationaleThe import has been changed from the standard
ospackage to a custom one (github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os). While this might provide project-specific functionality, it's important to ensure full compatibility with the standardospackage, especially for theHostname()function used inErrorHandler.Please confirm:
- Does the custom
ospackage fully implement all necessaryosfunctions used in this file?- What's the rationale behind using a custom
ospackage instead of the standard library?To verify the custom
ospackage implementation, run:internal/errors/usearch_test.go (1)
1-14: LGTM: License header and package declaration are correct.The license header is properly formatted and includes the correct copyright information. The package declaration is also correct.
Makefile.d/tools.mk (3)
222-226: Improved zlib build configurationThe additional CMake flags enhance the build process for zlib:
- Static linking is enforced with
-DZLIB_USE_STATIC_LIBS=ON.- Custom compiler flags are applied using
$(CXXFLAGS)and$(CFLAGS).- Installation paths are explicitly set, ensuring consistency across the project.
These changes provide better control over the build and installation process, which is beneficial for maintaining a consistent environment across different systems.
239-240: Enhanced HDF5 source retrieval and build configurationThe changes improve the HDF5 installation process:
Source retrieval (lines 239-240):
- The new URL format uses the GitHub archive, which is more reliable and consistent for version control.
Build configuration (lines 252-258):
- Explicit zlib paths ensure correct linking with the custom-built zlib.
- Custom compiler flags are applied using
$(CXXFLAGS)and$(CFLAGS).- Installation paths are explicitly set, maintaining consistency with the project structure.
These modifications enhance the reproducibility of the build process and ensure proper integration with the custom-built zlib library.
Also applies to: 252-258
222-226: Summary of improvementsThe changes to both zlib and HDF5 installation processes in this Makefile contribute to the overall objectives of the PR:
- Performance improvement: By ensuring static linking and applying custom compiler flags, the build process can potentially yield better-optimized binaries.
- Consistency: Explicit path settings and use of variables like
$(USR_LOCAL)and$(LIB_PATH)maintain consistency across different systems and builds.- Reproducibility: The use of specific versions and GitHub archives for source retrieval enhances the reproducibility of the build process.
These modifications align well with the goal of refactoring for performance, as stated in the PR objectives. They provide a solid foundation for consistent and optimized builds across different environments.
Also applies to: 239-240, 252-258
pkg/gateway/mirror/service/gateway_test.go (2)
203-203: Approved: Renaming test function to match unexported methodThe test function has been renamed from
Test_gateway_ForwardedContexttoTest_gateway_forwardedContext, which aligns with Go's naming conventions for unexported methods. This change improves consistency in the codebase.
304-304: Approved: Updated method call to match renamed methodThe method call has been updated from
g.ForwardedContexttog.forwardedContext, which is consistent with the renaming of the method in the main code. This change ensures that the test correctly calls the unexported method.internal/core/algorithm/usearch/option_test.go (1)
1-14: LGTM: Package declaration and license header look good.The package declaration and license header are correctly implemented.
go.mod (4)
322-322: gRPC version updateThe gRPC library has been updated to version 1.67.1. This update may include important bug fixes and performance improvements.
To ensure compatibility with the updated gRPC version, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any gRPC-related issues after the update go test $(go list ./... | grep -v vendor | grep -E 'grpc|rpc')
18-18: Multiple dependency updatesSeveral dependencies have been updated to newer versions. Notable updates include:
code.cloudfoundry.org/bytefmtupdated to v0.11.0github.com/Azure/go-amqpupdated to v1.2.0github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configupdated to v1.27.39github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsupdated to v1.17.37github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/managerupdated to v1.17.25github.com/gocql/gocqlupdated to v1.7.0github.com/google/pprofupdated to v0.0.0-20241001023024-f7ea664c9cffgithub.com/prometheus/commonupdated to v0.60.0golang.org/x/mobileupdated to v0.0.0-20240930194658-c6794c95c70bgoogle.golang.org/genproto,google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api,google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcupdated to v0.0.0-20240930140551-af27646dc61fgoogle.golang.org/grpcupdated to v1.67.1github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golangadded with version v0.0.0-20240928043120-b3da75964080These updates may include new features, bug fixes, and performance improvements. However, they might also introduce breaking changes or compatibility issues.
To ensure compatibility with the updated dependencies, please run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility with updated dependencies go mod tidy go build ./... go test ./...Also applies to: 28-28, 50-51, 53-53, 61-68, 135-135, 157-157, 242-242, 302-302, 319-322, 383-383, 409-410, 465-465, 493-493
3-3: Go version updated to 1.23.2The Go version has been updated from 1.23.1 to 1.23.2. This is a minor version update, which typically includes bug fixes and performance improvements.
To ensure compatibility with the new Go version, please run the following command to verify that all tests pass:
383-383: New dependency added: github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golangA new dependency has been added:
github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golang v0.0.0-20240928043120-b3da75964080. This appears to be a search-related library.To ensure this new dependency is used correctly and doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following commands:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Dependency
github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golangis properly integrated and utilized in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of the new usearch dependency rg --type go "github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golang"Length of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of 'github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golang' in Go files rg "github.com/unum-cloud/usearch/golang" --type goLength of output: 226
internal/net/grpc/status/status.go (4)
141-141: SettingdefaultCodetocodes.Unknownis appropriateInitializing
defaultCodewithcodes.Unknownensures that unknown errors are properly categorized, enhancing error handling consistency.
255-263: Efficient hostname initializationCaching the hostname at initialization improves performance by avoiding redundant calls to
os.Hostname(). This implementation is effective and enhances efficiency.
271-271: Using cachedhostnameintoProtoMessageSetting the
Domainfield to the cachedhostnamevariable is appropriate and ensures consistent domain information in error details.
442-461: RefactoringwithDetailsfunction for clarity and efficiencyThe updated
withDetailsfunction enhances the way details are managed and appended to the status. The early return pattern improves readability and the use of helper functions streamlines the code..gitfiles (6)
633-633: Addition of Test File forhack/actions/genIt's great to see
main_test.goadded to thehack/actions/gendirectory. This will enhance the test coverage for the code generation tools, ensuring they function as expected.
721-722: Introduction of Deadlink ToolThe addition of
hack/tools/deadlink/index.htmlandhack/tools/deadlink/main.goindicates the inclusion of a new tool for detecting dead links. This is a valuable addition for maintaining documentation quality.
893-893: Addition of Test Options for USearch AlgorithmThe new test file
internal/core/algorithm/usearch/option_test.gosuggests that unit tests for the USearch algorithm options have been implemented. Ensure that all critical paths and edge cases are thoroughly tested.
1039-1039: Unit Tests for USearch Error Handling AddedThe file
internal/errors/usearch_test.gohas been added to cover error cases related to USearch. It's important to have comprehensive tests for error scenarios to improve the robustness of the algorithm.
1169-1169: Updates to gRPC Codes Test SuiteThe changes in
internal/net/grpc/codes/codes_test.goindicate updates or additions to the test cases for gRPC status codes. Verify that all new status codes and scenarios are adequately tested.
1297-1298: New OS Hostname Utility and Tests AddedThe addition of
internal/os/hostname.goand its corresponding testinternal/os/hostname_test.gointroduces a utility for retrieving OS hostname information. Ensure cross-platform compatibility and that all edge cases are handled.
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/errors" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/log" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/net" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Detected: Missing Hostname Function in Internal os Package
The internal github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os package does not define the Hostname() function, which is being called in pkg/discoverer/k8s/handler/grpc/option.go. This will cause a compilation error or runtime failure.
- File Affected:
pkg/discoverer/k8s/handler/grpc/option.go
Please implement the Hostname() function in the internal os package or revert to using the standard library os package to ensure proper functionality.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Import change to internal os package
The change from the standard library os package to the internal "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os" package looks good. This could potentially allow for more control and optimization, which aligns with the performance improvement goals mentioned in the PR objectives.
Please ensure that the internal os package provides the same functionality as the standard library os package, especially for the Hostname() function. Run the following script to verify:
Consider updating any relevant documentation to reflect this change, especially if there are any differences in behavior or usage between the standard os package and the internal one.
</details>
<details>
<summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the functionality of the internal os package
# Test: Check if the Hostname function is defined in the internal os package
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func Hostname() (string, error)' pkg/discoverer/k8s/handler/grpc/option.go
# Test: Verify usage of the Hostname function
rg --type go 'os\.Hostname\(\)' pkg/discoverer/k8s/handler/grpc/option.go
Length of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the Hostname function in the internal os package
# Find all Go files in the internal os package
FILES=$(fd --type f --extension go pkg/discoverer/k8s/internal/os/)
# Test: Check if the Hostname function is defined in the internal os package
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func Hostname() (string, error)' $FILES
Length of output: 135
| @@ -37,6 +37,6 @@ require ( | |||
| golang.org/x/sys v0.25.0 // indirect | |||
| golang.org/x/text v0.18.0 // indirect | |||
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142 // indirect | |||
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240903143218-8af14fe29dc1 // indirect | |||
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 // indirect | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential version mismatch in genproto packages
The version of google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc in the require section (v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61) is different from the version specified in the replace section (v0.0.0-20240930140551-af27646dc61f). This could potentially lead to compatibility issues.
Consider aligning these versions to ensure consistency:
-google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 // indirect
+google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240930140551-af27646dc61f // indirectAlternatively, you may want to update the replace directive to match this version if it's more recent and compatible with your project.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240924160255-9d4c2d233b61 // indirect | |
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240930140551-af27646dc61f // indirect |
| @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
| module github.com/vdaas/vald/example/client | |||
|
|
|||
| go 1.23.1 | |||
| go 1.23.2 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect Go version specified
The Go version specified (1.23.2) does not exist. As of October 2024, the latest stable version of Go is in the 1.22.x series. Please update this to the correct version, likely 1.22.x or the latest available stable version.
Consider updating the Go version to the latest stable release:
-go 1.23.2
+go 1.22.xReplace 'x' with the latest minor version available.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| "runtime" | ||
| "time" | ||
|
|
||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/log" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/net" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Internal os package not found.
The import statement for github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os in option.go is invalid because the internal os package does not exist in the repository. This will cause build failures.
Please address the following:
- Revert the import to use the standard
ospackage unless the internal implementation is provided. - If an internal
ospackage is intended, ensure it is correctly added to the repository.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve the import change with suggestions.
The change from the standard os package to github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os looks good. This switch to an internal implementation can provide more control and potentially improve performance.
However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that the
Hostname()function in the internalospackage is fully compatible with the standard library's implementation. - If there are any behavioral differences or additional features in the internal
os.Hostname()function, update the documentation of theWithNamefunction to reflect these changes.
To verify the compatibility, please run the following script:
This script will help ensure that the Hostname() function is properly implemented in the internal package and identify any other usages in the codebase that might need to be updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the behavior of the internal os.Hostname() with the standard library
# Test: Check if the internal os package exists and has a Hostname function
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func Hostname() (string, error)' github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os
# Test: Compare usage of Hostname in other parts of the codebase
rg --type go 'os\.Hostname\(\)' -g '!pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/option.go'
Length of output: 835
| "runtime" | ||
|
|
||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/errors" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/log" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/net" | ||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Internal os Package Missing Hostname Implementation
The internal os package (github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os) does not implement the Hostname() function as the standard library does. This omission can lead to inconsistencies and potential runtime errors.
Please address the following:
- Implement the
Hostname()function in the internalospackage to match the standard library's functionality. - Review all usages of
os.Hostname()to ensure they reference the internal package's implementation correctly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve change with verification request
The replacement of the standard os package with an internal one (github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os) is noted. This change could provide more control over OS interactions or add custom behavior.
However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that the
Hostname()function in the internalospackage provides the same functionality as the standard library'sos.Hostname(). - If there are any differences in behavior or additional features, update the documentation to reflect these changes.
- Consider the implications for testing and portability, especially if the internal package behaves differently on various operating systems.
To verify the functionality of the internal os package, please run the following script:
This script will help ensure that the internal os package provides the necessary Hostname() function and compare its usage with the standard library version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the standard os.Hostname() with the internal os.Hostname()
# Test: Check if the internal os package exists and contains the Hostname function
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func Hostname() (string, error)' github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os
# Test: Compare usage of standard os.Hostname() with internal os.Hostname()
rg --type go 'os\.Hostname\(\)' -g '!internal/**'
rg --type go 'os\.Hostname\(\)' internal/
Length of output: 920
| } else if m.GetServingData() != r.GetServingData() && !strings.Contains(m.GetServingData(), r.GetServingData()) { | ||
| m.ServingData += "\t" + r.GetServingData() | ||
| if ok && r != nil { | ||
| key := errdetails.RequestInfoMessageName + r.GetRequestId() + r.GetServingData() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential key collision in RequestInfo
Constructing keys with RequestId and ServingData may result in collisions.
Implement a struct key:
type requestInfoKey struct {
requestId string
servingData string
}
key := requestInfoKey{
requestId: r.GetRequestId(),
servingData: r.GetServingData(),
}| } else if m.GetDescription() != r.GetDescription() && !strings.Contains(m.GetDescription(), r.GetDescription()) { | ||
| m.Description += "\t" + r.GetDescription() | ||
| if ok && r != nil { | ||
| key := errdetails.ResourceInfoMessageName + r.GetResourceType() + r.GetResourceName() + r.GetDescription() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential key collision in ResourceInfo
Concatenated ResourceType, ResourceName, and Description may not uniquely identify resources.
Consider a composite key:
type resourceInfoKey struct {
resourceType string
resourceName string
description string
}
key := resourceInfoKey{
resourceType: r.GetResourceType(),
resourceName: r.GetResourceName(),
description: r.GetDescription(),
}| if m.GetRetryDelay() == nil || r.GetRetryDelay().Seconds < m.GetRetryDelay().Seconds { | ||
| m.RetryDelay = r.GetRetryDelay() | ||
| if ok && r != nil { | ||
| key := errdetails.RetryInfoMessageName + strconv.FormatInt(r.GetRetryDelay().GetSeconds(), 10) + strconv.FormatInt(int64(r.GetRetryDelay().GetNanos()), 10) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential key collision in RetryInfo
Using concatenated retry delay values as a key may lead to collisions, especially if delays are similar.
Use a struct to create a unique key:
type retryInfoKey struct {
seconds int64
nanos int32
}
key := retryInfoKey{
seconds: r.GetRetryDelay().GetSeconds(),
nanos: r.GetRetryDelay().GetNanos(),
}| @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import ( | |||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/net/grpc/errdetails" | |||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/net/grpc/proto" | |||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/net/grpc/types" | |||
| "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider aliasing the custom 'os' package to avoid confusion
Importing github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os directly as os may cause confusion with the standard library's os package. To improve code clarity and maintainability, consider aliasing the custom package.
Apply this diff to alias the custom os package:
-import (
// ... other imports ...
"github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os"
// ... other imports ...
)
+import (
// ... other imports ...
+ vos "github.com/vdaas/vald/internal/os"
// ... other imports ...
)Update the usage accordingly:
- h, err = os.Hostname()
+ h, err = vos.Hostname()Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| // prDur time.Duration | ||
| // dialer net.Dialer | ||
| // enablePoolRebalance bool | ||
| // disableResolveDNSAddrs sync.Map[string, bool] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect type declaration of sync.Map
The sync.Map type does not accept type parameters in its declaration. The line declaring disableResolveDNSAddrs should be updated to remove the type parameters.
Apply this diff to correct the type:
- disableResolveDNSAddrs sync.Map[string, bool]
+ disableResolveDNSAddrs sync.Map📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // disableResolveDNSAddrs sync.Map[string, bool] | |
| // disableResolveDNSAddrs sync.Map |
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v1.7 #2668 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 24.00%
===============================================
Files ? 539
Lines ? 47179
Branches ? 0
===============================================
Hits ? 11324
Misses ? 35086
Partials ? 769 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
kpango
deleted the
backport/release/v1.7/refactor/internal-grpc/improve-withDetails-function-performance
branch
Description
Related Issue
Versions
Checklist
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores