Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport PR #2639 to release/v1.7 for Refctor for release v1.7.14 #2648
Backport PR #2639 to release/v1.7 for Refctor for release v1.7.14 #2648
Changes from all commits
a76f96c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider a more maintainable approach for version numbers in templates
While updating the version numbers for Docker, Kubernetes, and Helm is good for keeping the template current, there are a couple of points to consider:
The Vald version (v1.7.13) hasn't been updated, although the PR objectives mention refactoring for release v1.7.14. This inconsistency might lead to confusion.
Frequently updating version numbers in issue templates can become a maintenance burden and may lead to outdated information if not regularly maintained.
Consider the following approaches:
Use placeholder text for versions that change frequently, e.g.,
Docker Version: vX.Y.Z
. This allows users to fill in the current version when reporting an issue.Alternatively, if you want to keep specific versions, implement an automated process to update these templates when new releases are made.
Update the Vald version to v1.7.14 to align with the PR objectives, or clarify why it should remain at v1.7.13.
Example of using placeholder text:
This approach would reduce the need for frequent updates to the template while still prompting users to provide their specific environment details.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistency Detected in
E2E_WAIT_FOR_CREATE_INDEX_DURATION
Across JobsThe
E2E_WAIT_FOR_CREATE_INDEX_DURATION
is set to5m
in thee2e-stream-crud-skip-exist-check
job but remains at3m
in other jobs. To ensure consistency and prevent potential timeout issues across all E2E tests, please update the duration to5m
in the following jobs:🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Increased wait time for index creation in
e2e-stream-crud-skip-exist-check
job.Extending the
E2E_WAIT_FOR_CREATE_INDEX_DURATION
from 3 minutes to 5 minutes is a good adjustment. This change should help reduce potential false negatives in the E2E tests caused by timeout issues during index creation.However, it's worth considering whether this change should be applied to other jobs in the workflow that use the same parameter. For consistency and to prevent similar timeout issues, you might want to update the duration in other jobs such as
e2e-stream-crud
,e2e-stream-crud-for-operator
, ande2e-stream-crud-under-index-management-jobs
.To check for consistency across jobs, you can run the following command:
This will help identify which jobs might need to be updated for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 788
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Redundant copying of static library file
The static library
libusearch_static_c.a
is being copied to both$(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_c.a
and$(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_static_c.a
. Unless both filenames are required for compatibility reasons, this duplication may be unnecessary.Consider removing one of the copy commands to eliminate redundancy:
cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_c.a -cp $(TEMP_DIR)/usearch-$(USEARCH_VERSION)/build/libusearch_static_c.a $(LIB_PATH)/libusearch_static_c.a
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Installation Verification Failed
The
usearch/install
target does not correctly installusearch.h
and related components.usearch.h
: The header fileusearch.h
is not found in/usr/local/include/
./usr/local/include/
does not exist, preventing proper installation of header files.Please review the
usearch/install
target in the Makefile to ensure that all required directories are created and thatusearch.h
along with other components are correctly installed.🔗 Analysis chain
Improved usearch installation process
The
usearch/install
target has been updated to use a more robust installation process. This change improves the build and installation of the usearch library.Key improvements:
git clone
to fetch the source code, ensuring version consistency.These changes should result in a more optimized and better-integrated usearch library.
To ensure the installation process works as expected, you can run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 200
Script:
Length of output: 143
Script:
Length of output: 176
Script:
Length of output: 1093
Script:
Length of output: 548