Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor test checkFunc condition #2599

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

vankichi
Copy link
Contributor

@vankichi vankichi commented Sep 9, 2024

Description

SSIA

Related Issue

Versions

  • Vald Version: v1.7.13
  • Go Version: v1.23.0
  • Rust Version: v1.80.0
  • Docker Version: v27.1.1
  • Kubernetes Version: v1.30.3
  • Helm Version: v3.15.3
  • NGT Version: v2.2.4
  • Faiss Version: v1.8.0

Checklist

Special notes for your reviewer

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted the conditional logic in test functions to improve accuracy in vector dimension checks, allowing for more granular error reporting and potentially enhancing test reliability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the conditional checks in the test functions TestFloat32VectorGenerator and TestUint8VectorGenerator. The previous implementation used a direct equality comparison to validate the lengths of generated vectors against expected dimensions. This has been changed to a logical OR operator and subsequently to separate checks for each dimension, allowing for more granular error reporting. These alterations affect the control flow and may lead to different outcomes in the tests.

Changes

Files Change Summary
internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go Modified conditional checks in TestFloat32VectorGenerator and TestUint8VectorGenerator to use logical expressions for dimension validation, allowing for individual error reporting.

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vdaas-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

vdaas-ci commented Sep 9, 2024

[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.

  • 🙆‍♀️ /approve - approve
  • 🍱 /format - format codes and add licenses
  • /gen-test - generate test codes
  • 🏷️ /label - add labels
  • 🔚 2️⃣ 🔚 /label actions/e2e-deploy - run E2E deploy & integration test

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b17cc73 and a8489bc.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go (2 hunks)

internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.56%. Comparing base (4560a2b) to head (fbeb95f).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2599      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   24.55%   24.56%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         530      530              
  Lines       45522    45522              
==========================================
+ Hits        11176    11181       +5     
+ Misses      33596    33592       -4     
+ Partials      750      749       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Deploying vald with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: fbeb95f
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://a64069ce.vald.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://bugfix-internal-fix-gen-test.vald.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8489bc and 4d60fae.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go (1 hunks)

internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d60fae and fbeb95f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • internal/test/data/vector/gen_test.go

@vankichi vankichi requested review from a team, kmrmt and hlts2 and removed request for a team September 10, 2024 07:03
@vankichi vankichi changed the title Fix test checkFunc condition Refactor test checkFunc condition Sep 10, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@hlts2 hlts2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@hlts2 hlts2 merged commit f418cc9 into main Sep 10, 2024
76 of 77 checks passed
@hlts2 hlts2 deleted the bugfix/internal/fix-gen-test-checkfc branch September 10, 2024 07:42
vdaas-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
* 🐛 ✅ Fix checkFun condition

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

* ♻️ Fix by feedback

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

* ♻️ Fix by feedback

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
vankichi added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
* 🐛 ✅ Fix checkFun condition



* ♻️ Fix by feedback



* ♻️ Fix by feedback



---------

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kiichiro YUKAWA <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2024
2 tasks
@kpango kpango mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024
takuyaymd pushed a commit to takuyaymd/vald that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* 🐛 ✅ Fix checkFun condition

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

* ♻️ Fix by feedback

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

* ♻️ Fix by feedback

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
takuyaymd pushed a commit to takuyaymd/vald that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* 🐛 ✅ Fix checkFun condition

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

* ♻️ Fix by feedback

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

* ♻️ Fix by feedback

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants