Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor updates to move the code to more const-correct #756
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Minor updates to move the code to more const-correct #756
Changes from all commits
35792d4
07dfc73
677719d
00ac5fb
34ab7f0
ac06493
6cc2904
09f0b90
d722b89
82f1e40
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider additional const-correctness improvements
While making local variables const is good, there are additional opportunities to improve const-correctness and efficiency:
const
since it doesn't modify the object's statex
could be passed by const reference to avoid copying📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Good performance optimization.
The change from returning
std::string
toconst std::string&
is a good optimization that avoids unnecessary string copies while maintaining safety through thread-local storage.Consider expanding the comment to be more explicit about lifetime guarantees:
📝 Committable suggestion