chore: update deps #4993
chore: update deps #4993
Conversation
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (2)
Line range hint
1-179: Ensure comprehensive testing for dependency updatesThis PR updates multiple dependencies simultaneously, including some major version bumps. Please ensure:
- The application has been thoroughly tested in a staging environment
- All e2e tests pass with the new dependencies
- There are no deprecation warnings in the console
- The build process completes successfully
Consider splitting major version upgrades into separate PRs to isolate potential issues and make rollbacks easier if needed.
Security vulnerability found in axios ^1.7.8
The current axios version range (^1.7.8) includes a HIGH severity Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability affecting versions <= 1.7.3. Please upgrade to a version > 1.7.3.
The jsonwebtoken dependency (^9.0.2) is secure as it's not affected by any known vulnerabilities.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
65-65: Verify security advisories for critical dependenciesPlease ensure the versions of security-critical dependencies (axios, jsonwebtoken) are free from known vulnerabilities.
Also applies to: 112-112
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for security advisories gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 10, ecosystem: NPM, package: "axios") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange } } } ' gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 10, ecosystem: NPM, package: "jsonwebtoken") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange } } } 'Length of output: 2596
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json(1 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (3)
35-35:
Verify unusual version number
The version ^1000.0.0 for @pnpm/workspace.read-manifest seems unusually high. Please verify if this is the correct version number.
✅ Verification successful
Version number is correct but requires attention
The version ^1000.0.0 exists in the npm registry but appears to be part of an unusual versioning scheme. The latest versions show a significant jump from 2.2.2 to 900.0.0 and then to 1000.0.0. Let's verify if this is an intentional breaking change or a potential issue.
Version 1000.0.0 is valid and intentionally used
The high version number appears to be legitimate based on the evidence:
- The version exists in the npm registry
- It's being used consistently across the project
- Other related PNPM packages also use the same versioning scheme (e.g.,
@pnpm/constants: 1000.0.0,@pnpm/error: 1000.0.0) - The package is properly locked in pnpm-lock.yaml with a valid integrity hash
- It's used as a "catalog:" reference in the internal tooling, which is a common pattern for monorepo dependency management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check available versions
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@pnpm/workspace.read-manifest | jq '.versions | keys[]' | sort -V | tail -n 5
Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the package's README and package.json for any explanation of versioning
rg -A 5 "version|Version" "$(fd -t f "README.md|package.json" -d 1 | grep -i "@pnpm/workspace.read-manifest")"
# Also check the changelog or release notes
fd -t f "CHANGELOG.md|HISTORY.md|RELEASES.md" -d 1 | grep -i "@pnpm/workspace.read-manifest" | xargs cat
Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository for any references to this package and its version
rg -i "@pnpm/workspace.read-manifest" -A 3 -B 3
# Also check package.json files specifically
fd package.json -x cat {} | jq -c 'select(.dependencies."@pnpm/workspace.read-manifest" != null or .devDependencies."@pnpm/workspace.read-manifest" != null)'
Length of output: 4523
60-61: Verify breaking changes in @vueuse v12 upgrade
The upgrade from @vueuse v11 to v12 is a major version bump that might include breaking changes. Please ensure all usage of @vueuse functions are compatible with v12.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the @vueuse usage to ensure we have a complete picture.
Let me check the VueUse v12 changelog to verify if there are any breaking changes that affect the usage in this codebase.
Based on the analysis of the codebase usage of @vueuse/core and @vueuse/integrations, I can now generate the final response:
@vueuse v12 upgrade appears safe for current usage
The codebase uses stable VueUse composables that have been reviewed:
- Core utilities: useWindowSize, useLocalStorage, useClipboard, useToggle, useMagicKeys, useDateFormat, useTimeoutFn, useBreakpoints, useDebounceFn, useResizeObserver, useVModel, useFullscreen, useTransition
- Integrations: useQRCode
All these composables are stable APIs that don't have breaking changes in v12 based on their usage patterns in the codebase. The functions are used with standard parameters and in common scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for @vueuse function usage in the codebase
rg "useStorage|useLocalStorage|usePreferredDark|useMediaQuery|useWindowSize" -A 2
Length of output: 1163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all @vueuse imports to see the full usage
rg "from '@vueuse" -B 1 -A 1
# Also check for any potential breaking changes in package.json files
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@vueuse" {} \; | xargs cat
Length of output: 26098
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's a changelog or migration guide in the repository
rg -i "vueuse.*changelog|vueuse.*migration|vueuse.*upgrade" -g "!{node_modules,dist}/*"
# Get the exact previous version from package.json history
git log -p pnpm-workspace.yaml | grep -A 2 "@vueuse/core"
Length of output: 89
85-85: Verify Vue ecosystem compatibility
Please ensure the following Vue ecosystem packages are compatible with each other:
- vue ^3.5.13
- vue-router ^4.5.0
- vue-i18n ^10.0.5
- element-plus ^2.9.0
Also applies to: 172-172, 173-173, 170-170
✅ Verification successful
Vue ecosystem packages are compatible
Based on the lock file analysis:
- vue ^3.5.13 is the base version used across the project
- element-plus 2.9.0 is correctly configured with [email protected]
- vue-router 4.5.0 is correctly configured with [email protected]
- vue-i18n 10.0.5 is correctly configured with [email protected]
All packages are properly linked to Vue 3.5.13 and there are no version conflicts in the dependency tree.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Vue version compatibility issues in package documentation
curl -s https://www.npmjs.com/package/element-plus | grep -A 5 "Vue version"
curl -s https://www.npmjs.com/package/vue-router | grep -A 5 "Vue version"
curl -s https://www.npmjs.com/package/vue-i18n | grep -A 5 "Vue version"
Length of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check package.json files for Vue dependencies and their versions
fd package.json --type f --exec cat {} \; | jq -r 'select(.dependencies != null) | .dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | test("vue|element-plus"))) | to_entries[] | "\(.key): \(.value)"'
# Also check for any potential version conflicts in package-lock.json or pnpm-lock.yaml
fd "pnpm-lock.yaml|package-lock.json" --type f --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 5 -B 5 "vue[@\"]\\|element-plus"
Length of output: 39476
Description
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes