Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(@vben/docs): update nginx deployment error related documentation #4702

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

wangjue666
Copy link
Collaborator

@wangjue666 wangjue666 commented Oct 21, 2024

Description

image

在较高版本的 nginx 配置文件中,include mime.types; 会自动引入 mime.types 文件中的 MIME 类型定义,这导致与配置的 types 发生冲突。如果不注释这一行,系统会出现相关警告, 并且还是会无法解析 mjs文件, 所以也可以直接在mime.types 这个文件中进行调整

nginx: [warn] duplicate extension "js", content type: "application/javascript", previous content type: "application/javascript" in
http {
    include       mime.types;
    default_type  application/octet-stream;

    #log_format  main  '$remote_addr - $remote_user [$time_local] "$request" '
    #                  '$status $body_bytes_sent "$http_referer" '
    #                  '"$http_user_agent" "$http_x_forwarded_for"';

    #access_log  logs/access.log  main;

    sendfile        on;
    #tcp_nopush     on;

    #keepalive_timeout  0;
    keepalive_timeout  65;

    #gzip  on;

    types {
      application/javascript js mjs;
    }
|

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded the FAQ section with new solutions for Nginx deployment MIME type issues.
    • Improved formatting and clarity throughout the document, including clearer error handling instructions and troubleshooting steps.
    • Added guidance on dependency installation, cache updates, configuration file changes, and local development concerns.
    • Provided detailed examples and recommendations for common issues, enhancing overall usability.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 21, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 117c3d2

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the FAQ documentation for a project. Key updates include the expansion of sections related to Nginx deployment and dependency installation issues, improved formatting for clarity, and clearer instructions for error handling. Additional guidance on local development, cache updates, and configuration file changes has been provided. Overall, the modifications aim to improve usability and ensure users have comprehensive solutions to common problems.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs/src/en/guide/other/faq.md Expanded Nginx deployment section, improved formatting, clarified error handling instructions, and added troubleshooting steps for dependency installation issues.
docs/src/guide/other/faq.md Refined structure with new sections on dependency issues, cache updates, configuration changes, local development errors, and deployment concerns. Enhanced clarity on various common issues and solutions.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix(docs): typo #4595: This PR addresses a typo in the documentation, which is related to the overall improvements in clarity and guidance in the FAQ documentation of the main PR.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • vince292007
  • anncwb

Poem

In the garden of code, where rabbits play,
The FAQs bloom bright, guiding the way.
With tips for Nginx and dependencies too,
We hop through the changes, all shiny and new!
So read with delight, let your worries take flight,
For clarity reigns in the soft moonlight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/src/guide/other/faq.md (1)

144-159: LGTM! Consider adding a brief explanation of the error.

The new section about Nginx deployment issues is well-written and provides clear solutions to the MIME type error. It aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.

To enhance clarity, consider adding a brief explanation of the error at the beginning of the section. For example:

## nginx 部署

部署到 `nginx`后,可能会出现以下错误:

```bash
nginx: [warn] duplicate extension "js", content type: "application/javascript", previous content type: "application/javascript" in

这个错误是由于 MIME 类型定义冲突导致的。以下是两种解决方式:

[rest of the content remains the same]


This addition will help users understand the context of the error before diving into the solutions.

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>docs/src/en/guide/other/faq.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`144-159`: **LGTM! Consider minor improvements for clarity.**

The added section on nginx deployment is relevant and provides accurate solutions to the MIME type issues. However, consider the following suggestions to enhance readability:

1. Use consistent formatting for the solutions. For example, use headers for each solution:
   ```markdown
   ### Solution 1: Modify nginx configuration
   
   ### Solution 2: Modify mime.types file
  1. Add a brief explanation of why these solutions work, to help users understand the underlying issue.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bfaa278 and 117c3d2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/src/en/guide/other/faq.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/guide/other/faq.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

docs/src/en/guide/other/faq.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@vince292007 vince292007 merged commit 625862e into main Oct 21, 2024
14 checks passed
@vince292007 vince292007 deleted the doc-update-nginx-error branch October 21, 2024 09:01
@vince292007 vince292007 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 21, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2024
16 tasks
GavinLucky pushed a commit to GavinLucky/vue-vben-admin that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants