Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

recipes: Use dynamic layer for fsl-bsp-release #44

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kraj
Copy link

@kraj kraj commented Dec 7, 2024

Move the bbappends specific to meta-imx-bsp layers here this helps build without meta-imx layer

Move the bbappends specific to meta-imx-bsp layers here
this helps build without meta-imx layer

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
@kraj
Copy link
Author

kraj commented Dec 7, 2024

@nsdrude where do I find list of SOMs to be supported by scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01 layer ? will it support imx8qm-var-som ?

@nsdrude
Copy link
Contributor

nsdrude commented Dec 9, 2024

@nsdrude where do I find list of SOMs to be supported by scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01 layer ? will it support imx8qm-var-som ?

You can click on the soms on our wiki to see which releases are available for it: https://variwiki.com/

imx8qm-var-som will be supported by the next scarthgap release, we are not planning to support it in scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01

@kraj
Copy link
Author

kraj commented Dec 9, 2024

@nsdrude where do I find list of SOMs to be supported by scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01 layer ? will it support imx8qm-var-som ?

You can click on the soms on our wiki to see which releases are available for it: https://variwiki.com/

Thanks, already checked that before asking :)

imx8qm-var-som will be supported by the next scarthgap release, we are not planning to support it in scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01

Cool I will wait for var02 for yoe distro

@nsdrude
Copy link
Contributor

nsdrude commented Dec 11, 2024

@kraj this layer has a dependency on fsl-bsp-release: https://github.com/varigit/meta-variscite-bsp-imx/blob/scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01/conf/layer.conf#L16

Considering this, do you still think it makes sense to move the recipes to dynamic-layers?

@kraj
Copy link
Author

kraj commented Dec 12, 2024

@kraj this layer has a dependency on fsl-bsp-release: https://github.com/varigit/meta-variscite-bsp-imx/blob/scarthgap_6.6.23-2.0.0_var01/conf/layer.conf#L16

Considering this, do you still think it makes sense to move the recipes to dynamic-layers?

for keeping the layer clean, I think this still makes sense. Secondly, We do not use meta-imx and work with just meta-freescale and meta-variscite-bsp-imx, it also helps such usecase

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants