Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consolidate models, pydantic, protobuf types #1956

Closed
holtgrewe opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2063
Closed

Consolidate models, pydantic, protobuf types #1956

holtgrewe opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2063
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@holtgrewe
Copy link
Collaborator

holtgrewe commented Sep 4, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
There are subtle difference between the Django mdoels, Pydantic v2 models, and protobufs from the worker.

Describe the solution you'd like
Consolidate the types, names, etc. This must be followed by re-generating the spectacular-generated OpenAPI definitions as well as the front-end generated code.

Protobufs must be updated in worker.

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A

Additional context

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant