-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
batch effects #3
Comments
Hi Jiawen, Romain told me the reason it aligns well without batch correction in scVI is probably due to a size factor scaling scVI does. I havn't used DCA much since the paper came out, but I use scVI almost every day. I don't remember if DCA has batch correction methods built in, but this is a feature of scVI that I find works very well. |
I am newcomer of scVI. I notice that your scvi pipeline is different from that of scVI basic tutorial (https://github.com/YosefLab/scVI/blob/master/tests/notebooks/basic_tutorial.ipynb). |
How do you mean? The only differences I can think of is that I store data in AnnData objects rather than GeneDatasets, and I use a different library for tSNE visualization. |
I mean the pipeline in this link "https://github.com/vals/Blog/tree/master/180420-scrna-autoencoders". |
Oh the post from last April used an old version of scVI that is deprecatred. |
Dear,
|
Hi, I typically use I haven't used the supervised mode of scVI much, so can't comment on the effect of |
Dear,
in the Lukassen 2018 data, batch1 and batch2 do not align well using DCA (DCA on Lukassen.ipynb), while it seems to align the two mice quite well with scvi (scvi on Lukassen.ipynb)!
which one should I use ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: