Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regressions compared to GNU coreutils 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 #4627

Open
12 of 25 tasks
sylvestre opened this issue Mar 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
12 of 25 tasks

Regressions compared to GNU coreutils 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 #4627

sylvestre opened this issue Mar 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue For newcomers!

Comments

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

sylvestre commented Mar 25, 2023

Diffing the results from before and after #4601 and #4754
Some of them should be easy.

I noticed some regressions:

PASS -> FAIL:

{PASS,FAIL} -> SKIP

  • tests/cp/sparse-2.sh, tests/cp/sparse-extents-2.sh, tests/cp/sparse-extents.sh, tests/cp/sparse-perf.sh
  • tests/ls/ls-time.sh

New tests - PASS directly

  • tests/misc/runcon-compute.sh
  • tests/mv/no-copy.sh

New tests - FAIL

To run them:
bash util/run-gnu-test.sh <test>

How i did: I downloaded the results gnu-full-result.json in the action. The one before the update to 9.2 and just did a diff -u

@tertsdiepraam
Copy link
Member

These match up with the changelog, for example:

  • ls can now use modification time ls-time
  • cp, mv and install I think have debug output
  • cksum can output in base64

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor Author

cp sparse tests are SKIP because it is parsing the --debug output that we don't have:

$ cp --debug --reflink=never file.sparse_ file.sparse_.cp
'file.sparse_' -> 'file.sparse_.cp'
copy offload: unknown, reflink: no, sparse detection: SEEK_HOLE

@sylvestre sylvestre changed the title Regressions compared to GNU coreutils 9.2 Regressions compared to GNU coreutils 9.2 & 9.3 Apr 20, 2023
@sylvestre sylvestre changed the title Regressions compared to GNU coreutils 9.2 & 9.3 Regressions compared to GNU coreutils 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 Aug 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue For newcomers!
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants