Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VeyMont: stratified permissions #1210

Merged
merged 92 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bobismijnnaam
Copy link
Contributor

@bobismijnnaam bobismijnnaam commented May 31, 2024

Checklist:

  • The wiki is updated in accordance with the changes in this PR. For example: syntax changes, semantics changes, VerCors flags changes, etc.

PR description

  • Support for stratified permissions
  • Make case studies pass
    • TTT
    • TTTmsg
    • TTTlast
  • Implement postponed error reporting functionality
  • Re-enabled all te tests that are disabled because of missing support

Fixes #840.

…d to read fields after EncodePermissionStratification
…at checks for reference.bib in publications folder.
…th a constructorinvocation. Adjust passes for that. Make EncodeCurrentTHread compatible with choreographies. Move veymont passes to after inlineapplicable.
…ces about endpoint names literally apperaing in an expression, and not aliased
@bobismijnnaam bobismijnnaam marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2024 09:25
@bobismijnnaam bobismijnnaam merged commit c4a1921 into dev Jul 18, 2024
16 of 19 checks passed
@bobismijnnaam bobismijnnaam deleted the veymont-stratified-permissions branch July 18, 2024 08:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Veymont examples all lack permissions to verify. Adding the permissions in the necessary places is non-trivial
1 participant