Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a few PyTorch annotations #176

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 17, 2021

Conversation

yuhc
Copy link
Member

@yuhc yuhc commented Jun 17, 2021

Description

As titled.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Document update (this change is mainly a documentation update)

Checklist:

  • My code passes format and lint checks.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • I have tested my code with a reasonable workload.
  • My code may break some other features.

…nnGetConvolutionBackwardFilterAlgorithm_v7, cudnnGetConvolutionBackwardDataAlgorithm_v7, and cudaMemsetAsync
@yuhc yuhc added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 17, 2021
@yuhc yuhc merged commit 48131fb into utcs-scea:master Jun 17, 2021
@yuhc yuhc deleted the fix/pytorch_annotation branch June 17, 2021 01:45
photoszzt pushed a commit to photoszzt/ava that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2021
* Re-enable dynamic cudaMemcpyAsync() memory copy kind in pt_opt
* Bug fix in cudnnGetConvolutionForwardAlgorithm_v7, cudnnGetConvolutionBackwardFilterAlgorithm_v7, cudnnGetConvolutionBackwardDataAlgorithm_v7, and cudaMemsetAsync

Co-authored-by: Element Green <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants