Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

clarified the semantics of implemented-requirement in a component def… #1232

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2022
Merged

clarified the semantics of implemented-requirement in a component def… #1232

merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2022

Conversation

david-waltermire
Copy link
Contributor

@david-waltermire david-waltermire commented May 4, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Committer Notes

Clarified the semantics of implemented-requirement in a component definition as only a suggestion of how to implement. Resolves #1194.

All Submissions:

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?
  • Have you updated all OSCAL website and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the OSCAL website can be made in the docs/content directory of your branch.

@david-waltermire
clarified the semantics of implemented-requirement in a component def…
50c0945 
…inition as only a suggestion of how to implement. Resolves usnistgov#1194.
@david-waltermire david-waltermire added this to the OSCAL 1.0.3 milestone May 4, 2022
@david-waltermire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@GaryGapinski is this better?

@david-waltermire david-waltermire linked an issue May 4, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
Misleading XML Schema documentation for control-implementation implemented-requirement #1194
Closed
GaryGapinski
GaryGapinski approved these changes May 5, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@GaryGapinski GaryGapinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@david-waltermire david-waltermire merged commit d858a67 into usnistgov:release-1.0 May 5, 2022
@david-waltermire david-waltermire deleted the issue1194-clarify-implemented-requirement branch May 5, 2022 16:29
david-waltermire added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2022
@david-waltermire
clarified the semantics of implemented-requirement in a component def…
c654a11 
…inition as only a suggestion of how to implement. Resolves #1194. (#1232)
Rene2mt pushed a commit to Rene2mt/OSCAL that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
@david-waltermire @Rene2mt
clarified the semantics of implemented-requirement in a component def…
dc3360c 
…inition as only a suggestion of how to implement. Resolves usnistgov#1194. (usnistgov#1232)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@GaryGapinski GaryGapinski GaryGapinski approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
OSCAL 1.0.3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Misleading XML Schema documentation for control-implementation implemented-requirement
2 participants
@david-waltermire @GaryGapinski