-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a pulsar endpoint for EGI deployed instance #872
Conversation
The instance is automatically deployed with IM
Do you already have your password :) |
How should I share the password with you, @enolfc? |
How do you normally do? If I send a signed email, would you be able to send it back encrypted? |
@bgruening I do not know what is the usual procedure, but I don't have the toolchain needed for signed emails installed at the moment, so maybe let's just use GPG? I trust your GitHub account and I assume you can access a Generate a keypair (that we will use only for this and only once).
Get the public key using the command below and paste the output here on GitHub.
Do not close the terminal (because the key is in a temporary directory). With this output I can encrypt a message and paste it here on GitHub. Then you can copy it to a file (e.g. "my_password.txt.encrypted"). If you run
you will be prompted for a password. Enter "password" and the decrypted message will be available on my_password.txt :) Of course all this only works if you can use gpg haha |
I also don't know what the current procedure is. Mira is currently on vacation, but any encrypted channel works imho. And Matrix is e2e. You both have a matrix account correct? |
Yes I do. @enolfc I just sent you a message. |
Mira used to share the password via Matrix (encrypted chat). |
Can this be merged? (in other words: is the Pulsar endpoint ready?) |
inherits: pulsar_default | ||
runner: pulsar_eu_egi01 | ||
max_accepted_cores: 8 | ||
max_accepted_mem: 15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the moment we have a virtual HTCondor cluster with 6 compute nodes, 8 vCPUs and 16 GB each.
In the max_accepted_cores
and max_accepted_mem
do you include the total per node or per cluster?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
max_accepted_cores: Number of cores of the machine with the most cores in your cluster (8)
max_accepted_mem: Number of cores of the machine with the most memory in your cluster (15 looks good to me because you are going to need some memory for the OS, etc)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks, then it looks correct
As discussed in the context of the EuroScienceGateway project, the EGI pulsar endpoint is volatile as we are deploying/destroying trying to troubleshoot issues. If that's not an issue, I am happy with this to be merged and run tests. |
Shouldn't then this be "merged" to @sanjaysrikakulam's test instance instead? |
I am almost there with a test instance for ESG (https://usegalaxy.esgwps.uno). I will fix the last few things and run a couple of tests, and then we can start integrating ESG test pulsar instances to the ESG test Galaxy instance. I was on vacation last week so things got a bit delayed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As long as it is an opt-in feature that does not impact any user, I'm perfectly fine with getting this deployed.
This will be a Pulsar instance supported by the BYOC task of EuroScienceGateway deployed automatically by IM.