Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix issue property highlight #188

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

fix issue property highlight #188

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

Miranda-03
Copy link
Contributor

fix #50

Se tienen en cuenta las properties a la hora de buscar una definición.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.58%. Comparing base (970e6a7) to head (b120f0c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #188   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.58%   80.58%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         309      309           
  Branches       78       78           
=======================================
  Hits          249      249           
  Misses         60       60           
Flag Coverage Δ
debug-adapter 80.58% <ø> (ø)
lsp-ide-server 80.58% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fdodino
Copy link
Contributor

fdodino commented Oct 5, 2024

👏 👏 👏

una cosa que ayuda en un PR (sobre todo si el cambio es visual) es agregarle una demo, como ésta

property

eso refuerza la idea visible de que funciona de 10!!!

Copy link
Contributor

@fdodino fdodino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Groso PR!! 🍾 🐐 🥇 💯

@@ -8,4 +8,13 @@ object manolo {
method hacerVolarAPepita() {
pepita.vola()
}
}

object pepita_2 {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
object pepita_2 {
object pepita_2 {

Copy link
Contributor

@ivojawer ivojawer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💎 💎

Copy link
Contributor

@PalumboN PalumboN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Grosssoooo @Miranda-03 ! Muchas gracias! 🚀 👨‍🎤

Comment on lines +42 to +44
const getDefinitionFromSyntheticMethod = (method: Method) => {
return method.parent.allFields.find((field) => field.name === method.name && field.isProperty)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Esto es algo piola para tener en TS

@fdodino fdodino merged commit c971091 into master Oct 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@fdodino fdodino deleted the fixPropertyDefinition branch October 8, 2024 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Navegación con properties
4 participants