Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch provider families organization from upbound-release-candidates to upbound #121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

ulucinar
Copy link
Contributor

@ulucinar ulucinar commented Jun 9, 2023

Description of your changes

The reusable workflow currently pushes the built family provider packages under to the upbound-release-candidates repository. We would now like to push them to the respective package repositories under the upbound organization in xpkg.upbound.io.

I have:

  • Run make reviewable test to ensure this PR is ready for review.

How has this code been tested

Copy link

@jastang jastang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with one comment

@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ jobs:
if [ $num_packages -gt 10 ]; then
num_packages=10
fi
make -j $num_packages SUBPACKAGES="${{ steps.packages.outputs.target }}" XPKG_REG_ORGS=xpkg.upbound.io/upbound-release-candidates XPKG_REG_ORGS_NO_PROMOTE=xpkg.upbound.io/upbound-release-candidates VERSION=${{ inputs.version }} build.all
make -j $num_packages SUBPACKAGES="${{ steps.packages.outputs.target }}" XPKG_REG_ORGS=xpkg.upbound.io/upbound XPKG_REG_ORGS_NO_PROMOTE=xpkg.upbound.io/upbound VERSION=${{ inputs.version }} build.all
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to pass XPKG_REG_ORGS and XPKG_REG_ORGS_NO_PROMOTE anymore since xpkg.upbound.io is the default in the provider Makefiles?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @jastang,
I think it should be okay to remove them. I will give it a try in a follow-up PR.

@ulucinar ulucinar merged commit dd9eb74 into upbound:main Jun 12, 2023
@ulucinar ulucinar deleted the ssop-switch-regorg branch June 12, 2023 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants