Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature: clean up block conditions #2292

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024
Merged

Feature: clean up block conditions #2292

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

nielslyngsoe
Copy link
Member

A part of moving Block Conditions was not cleaned up properly

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (minor updates related to the tooling or maintenance of the repository, does not impact compiled assets)

Motivation and context

How to test?

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Checklist

  • If my change requires a change to the documentation, I have updated the documentation in this pull request.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@nielslyngsoe nielslyngsoe merged commit d9a9cbd into v15/dev Sep 13, 2024
8 checks passed
@nielslyngsoe nielslyngsoe deleted the v15/feature/emm-clean-up-block-conditions branch September 13, 2024 18:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@madsrasmussen madsrasmussen madsrasmussen approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
category/breaking release/15.0.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nielslyngsoe @madsrasmussen