Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include LookaheadStream from analysis-model #467

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2021
Merged

Conversation

uhafner
Copy link
Owner

@uhafner uhafner commented Dec 4, 2021

A LookaheadStream is a stream of lines with a lookahead of one line. Useful to parse a stream of lines when it is required to check if the next line matches a given regular expression.

@uhafner uhafner added the feature New features label Dec 4, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #467 (99d7f7b) into main (f759543) will increase coverage by 0.97%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #467      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     88.85%   89.83%   +0.97%     
- Complexity       82       98      +16     
============================================
  Files             8        9       +1     
  Lines           323      354      +31     
  Branches         48       50       +2     
============================================
+ Hits            287      318      +31     
  Misses           29       29              
  Partials          7        7              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../main/java/edu/hm/hafner/util/LookaheadStream.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f759543...99d7f7b. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants