Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure that tests are package private when using JUnit 5 #371

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2021

Conversation

uhafner
Copy link
Owner

@uhafner uhafner commented Jun 11, 2021

Ensure that tests are package private when using JUnit 5.

@uhafner uhafner added the enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality label Jun 11, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #371 (2712066) into master (b630806) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #371   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     88.85%   88.85%           
  Complexity       82       82           
=========================================
  Files             8        8           
  Lines           323      323           
  Branches         48       48           
=========================================
  Hits            287      287           
  Misses           29       29           
  Partials          7        7           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b630806...2712066. Read the comment docs.

@uhafner uhafner merged commit 8c74103 into master Jun 11, 2021
@uhafner uhafner deleted the package-private-tests branch June 11, 2021 15:05
@uhafner uhafner changed the title Package private tests Ensure that tests are package private when using JUnit 5 Jul 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants