Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a method to SerializableTest to obtain a restored object #230

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2020

Conversation

uhafner
Copy link
Owner

@uhafner uhafner commented Sep 16, 2020

No description provided.

@uhafner uhafner added the enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality label Sep 16, 2020
@uhafner uhafner changed the title Add a method to SerializabbleTest to obtain a restored object Add a method to SerializableTest to obtain a restored object Sep 16, 2020
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #230 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #230   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     88.19%   88.19%           
  Complexity       79       79           
=========================================
  Files             8        8           
  Lines           322      322           
  Branches         47       47           
=========================================
  Hits            284      284           
  Misses           30       30           
  Partials          8        8           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/main/java/edu/hm/hafner/util/FilteredLog.java 100.00% <ø> (ø) 15.00 <0.00> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e17eca7...c743ce1. Read the comment docs.

@uhafner uhafner merged commit 0d3caec into master Sep 16, 2020
@uhafner uhafner deleted the return-serializable branch September 16, 2020 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants