Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split input_data.F90 into atm_input_data, sfc_input_data, and nst_target_data #460

Closed
kgerheiser opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kgerheiser
Copy link
Contributor

input_data.F90 is a really long file that I think could be broken up to make it more managable. It seems like it does 3 different things for 3 types of data, and it would make sense to group them together.

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@kgerheiser This will make writing unit tests easier. What is the status? I can work on this if you are busy with other tasks.

@kgerheiser
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll put in a PR today.

@LarissaReames-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@kgerheiser did you ever go back to try to tackle this? I think it's still worth doing as that file really is quite large.

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@kgerheiser did you ever go back to try to tackle this? I think it's still worth doing as that file really is quite large.

Unfortunately, Kyle no longer works for NOAA. But I still think his suggestion is a good one.

@LarissaReames-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@kgerheiser did you ever go back to try to tackle this? I think it's still worth doing as that file really is quite large.

Unfortunately, Kyle no longer works for NOAA. But I still think his suggestion is a good one.

Yes I think so too. Any thoughts on the best way to do this? Do we just do a straight up split of those subroutines in to 3 files?

@GeorgeGayno-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@kgerheiser did you ever go back to try to tackle this? I think it's still worth doing as that file really is quite large.

Unfortunately, Kyle no longer works for NOAA. But I still think his suggestion is a good one.

Yes I think so too. Any thoughts on the best way to do this? Do we just do a straight up split of those subroutines in to 3 files?

Maybe the first step is to do an inventory of all the routines and what they do. Not all of the routines read data. Some could probably be moved to the utility module.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants