Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 584: Replace errant reference to non-existent concept owl:Datatype #585

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist commented Feb 1, 2024

This Pull Request resolves all requirements of Issue #584 .

Coordination

  • Pull Request is against correct branch
  • Pull Request is in, or reverted to, Draft status before Solutions Approval vote has passed
  • CI passes in UCO feature branch against develop
  • CI passes in UCO current unstable branch (bb6bee3)
  • CI passes in CASE current unstable branch tracking UCO's unstable as submodule (4663451)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for CASE-Corpora
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for CASE-Corpora
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for CASE-Examples
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for CASE-Examples (N/A)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for casework.github.io
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for casework.github.io (N/A)
  • Milestone linked
  • Solutions Approval vote logged on corresponding Issue (N/A)

No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* #584

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist added this to the UCO 1.4.0 milestone Feb 1, 2024
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist linked an issue Feb 1, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
10 tasks
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2024 18:24
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist requested a review from a team March 13, 2024 18:24
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

@plbt5 plbt5 merged commit 38c21b7 into develop Apr 30, 2024
1 check passed
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist deleted the BugFix-Issue-584 branch June 18, 2024 14:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

owl:Datatype mistakenly used when rdfs:Datatype is intended
2 participants