Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added active storage queues to sidekiq configuration #1663

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2020

Conversation

pgwillia
Copy link
Member

@pgwillia pgwillia commented May 27, 2020

Context

When I was depositing items I was finding that a active_storage_analysis queue was filling up but not being processed.

https://mikerogers.io/2019/06/06/rails-6-sidekiq-queues.html describes some new queue names in Rails 6 for ActiveStorage.

I've added the ones that make sense to me.

Note that this doesn't resolve the "This file is processing and will be available shortly" message for deposited items like I had hoped it would.

What's New

Add active_storage_analysis and active_storage_purge queues to sidekiq config. I also added critical and low but less certain if they'll actually be used by our application at any point.

When I was depositing items I was finding that a active_storage_analysis queue was filling up but not being processed.

https://mikerogers.io/2019/06/06/rails-6-sidekiq-queues.html describes some new queue names for ActiveStorage.

I've added the ones that make sense to me.

Note that this doesn't resolve the "This file is processing and will be available shortly" message for deposited items like I had hoped it would.
Copy link
Contributor

@murny murny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Thanks for adding this 🎉

@pgwillia pgwillia merged commit 9f812fb into integration_postmigration May 27, 2020
@pgwillia pgwillia deleted the missing_sidekiq_queues branch May 27, 2020 23:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants