Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add current and future ruby to travis #1040

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2019

Conversation

pgwillia
Copy link
Member

@pgwillia pgwillia commented Mar 12, 2019

This application currently runs in production with Ruby 2.4. Some of our other application run with 2.5 and 2.6 is the newest. We can use travis to smoke test whether or not the changes we make are future compatible.

The con of this is that we're more likely to be caught in the flapping tests.

jefferya
jefferya previously approved these changes Mar 13, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@jefferya jefferya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

jefferya
jefferya previously approved these changes Apr 16, 2019
Gemfile.lock Outdated
@@ -576,4 +576,4 @@ DEPENDENCIES
wicked

BUNDLED WITH
1.17.3
2.0.1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rpm build environment Henry was using for another project (cwrc_preservation) was having trouble with Bundler v2. Maybe check with him before merging.

Gemfile.lock Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jefferya
jefferya previously approved these changes Apr 16, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@jefferya jefferya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

.travis.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pgwillia pgwillia merged commit 0823a82 into ualbertalib:master Apr 26, 2019
@pgwillia pgwillia deleted the travis_rvm_matrix branch April 26, 2019 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants