Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various fixes in QualifierPolymorphism #745

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Various fixes in QualifierPolymorphism #745

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

smillst
Copy link
Member

@smillst smillst commented May 26, 2016

Fixes the crash reported in #738, but the Issue738.java test case has another crash. (See #701)

smillst added 2 commits May 26, 2016 10:10
Fixes the crash reported in #738, but the Issue738 has another crash. (See #701)
@smillst smillst assigned wmdietl and smillst and unassigned wmdietl May 26, 2016
@smillst smillst assigned wmdietl and unassigned smillst May 27, 2016
// for super() and this() method calls, getReceiverType(tree) does not return the correct
// type. So, just skip those. This is consistent with skipping receivers of constructors
// below.
if (type.getReceiverType() != null && !(TreeUtils.isSuperCall(tree))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why the parens around isSuperCall?

@wmdietl wmdietl assigned smillst and unassigned wmdietl May 27, 2016
@wmdietl
Copy link
Member

wmdietl commented May 27, 2016

Just a few small comments.

smillst added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2016
Fixes the crash reported in #738, but the Issue738 has another crash. (See #701)
(Squashed version of #745)
@smillst
Copy link
Member Author

smillst commented May 27, 2016

Merged via 47470dc

@smillst smillst closed this May 27, 2016
@smillst smillst deleted the polyfixes branch May 27, 2016 22:16
Ao-senXiong pushed a commit to opprop/checker-framework that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants