-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Existential Quantification #45
Conversation
I doubt this will work correctly.
ENGLIIIIIIIISH
I... Think I've done it! |
OK, caveats: This is not real existential quantification. That would be impossible (or I'd at least win some kind of award, possibly named after Turing and padding my bank account considerably). The question now is do we treat a failing naïve search as a real failure or do the ScalaCheck thing and add an |
/// Uniqueness Quantification ("there exists one and only one") | ||
// case Uniqueness | ||
/// Counting Quantification ("there exist exactly k") | ||
// case Counting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you do add these, I suggest you just do Counting
. I don’t think Uniqueness
adds much to the interface and, presumably the implementation of Counting
would subsume Uniqueness
.
Welp, this is kinda strange... Travis doesn't seem to think this branch exists. I'll try again in a different pull request. |
An exploration (and hopefully, eventual solution) to #43.