Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Transition from Grunt to Gulp #20310

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

wolfy1339
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 commented Jul 16, 2016

As said in #17021 in the super ambitious nice to haves, I have transitioned from Grunt to Gulp.
Some things still need to be done and not everything works.
This is a base for the transition from Grunt to Gulp.
I have done my best to try to create all the tasks, it wan't that easy trying to find what each task does.
Also note that grunt-saucelabs does not have a gulp equivalent, so something will need to be thought out as an alternative.
Another note, the hound config needs updating.
If anyone has any improvements, please post them here.

]
}
}
};

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extra semicolon semi

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extra semicolon semi

@Johann-S
Copy link
Member

Johann-S commented Jul 16, 2016

It seems it's a question

Move to Gulp from Grunt?

but I want to know what's the reasons to move from Grunt to Gulp ?

@neilhem
Copy link
Contributor

neilhem commented Jul 16, 2016

@Johann-S because of it has been mentioned here #17021

We also have some super ambitious nice to haves: Move to Gulp from Grunt?

@cvrebert
Copy link
Collaborator

TBH, I'd rather move to npm scripts instead of gulp.

@cvrebert
Copy link
Collaborator

We're going with a different route: #20332

@cvrebert cvrebert closed this Jul 20, 2016
@wolfy1339
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, That's fine.

On Jul 20, 2016, at 15:43, Chris Rebert <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

We're going with a different route: #20332#20332

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/20310#issuecomment-234059307, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEYfFSpsJUxNN-trGzsmTiCSIiddCefIks5qXnpKgaJpZM4JN7Av.

@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 deleted the patch-2 branch December 13, 2017 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants