gem install rspec-puppet
For clarity and consistency, I recommend that you use the following directory structure and naming convention.
module
|
+-- manifests
|
+-- lib
|
+-- spec
|
+-- spec_helper.rb
|
+-- classes
| |
| +-- <class_name>_spec.rb
|
+-- defines
| |
| +-- <define_name>_spec.rb
|
+-- functions
| |
| +-- <function_name>_spec.rb
|
+-- hosts
|
+-- <host_name>_spec.rb
If you use the above directory structure, your examples will automatically be placed in the correct groups and have access to the custom matchers. If you choose not to, you can force the examples into the required groups as follows.
describe 'myclass', :type => :class do
...
end
describe 'mydefine', :type => :define do
...
end
describe 'myfunction', :type => :puppet_function do
...
end
describe 'myhost.example.com', :type => :host do
...
end
You can test if a resource exists in the catalogue with the generic
contain_<resource type>
matcher.
it { should contain_augeas('bleh') }
You can also test if a class has been included in the catalogue with the same matcher.
it { should contain_class('foo') }
If your resource type includes :: (e.g.
foo::bar
simply replace the :: with __ (two underscores).
it { should contain_foo__bar('baz') }
You can further test the parameters that have been passed to the resources with
the generic with_<parameter>
chains.
it { should contain_package('mysql-server').with_ensure('present') }
If you want to specify that the given parameters should be the only ones passed
to the resource, use the only_with_<parameter>
chains.
it { should contain_package('httpd').only_with_ensure('latest') }
You can use the with
method to verify the value of multiple parameters.
it do should contain_service('keystone').with(
'ensure' => 'running',
'enable' => 'true',
'hasstatus' => 'true',
'hasrestart' => 'true'
) end
The same holds for the only_with
method, which in addition verifies the exact
set of parameters and values for the resource in the catalogue.
it do should contain_user('luke').only_with(
'ensure' => 'present',
'uid' => '501'
) end
You can also test that specific parameters have been left undefined with the
generic without_<parameter>
chains.
it { should contain_file('/foo/bar').without_mode }
You can use the without method to verify that a list of parameters have not been defined
it { should contain_service('keystone').without(
['restart', 'status']
)}
You can test the number of resources in the catalogue with the
have_resource_count
matcher.
it { should have_resource_count(2) }
The number of classes in the catalogue can be checked with the
have_class_count
matcher.
it { should have_class_count(2) }
You can also test the number of a specific resource type, by using the generic
have_<resource type>_resource_count
matcher.
it { should have_exec_resource_count(1) }
This last matcher also works for defined types. If the resource type contains ::, you can replace it with __ (two underscores).
it { should have_logrotate__rule_resource_count(3) }
NOTE: when testing a class, the catalogue generated will always contain at least one class, the class under test. The same holds for defined types, the catalogue generated when testing a defined type will have at least one resource (the defined type itself).
To test that
sysctl { 'baz'
value => 'foo',
}
Will cause the following resource to be in included in catalogue for a host
exec { 'sysctl/reload':
command => '/sbin/sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf',
}
We can write the following testcase (in spec/defines/sysctl_spec.rb
)
describe 'sysctl' do
let(:title) { 'baz' }
let(:params) { { :value => 'foo' } }
it { should contain_exec('sysctl/reload').with_command("/sbin/sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf") }
end
let(:title) { 'foo' }
let(:params) { {:ensure => 'present', ...} }
If the manifest you're testing expects to run on host with a particular name, you can specify this as follows
let(:node) { 'testhost.example.com' }
By default, the test environment contains no facts for your manifest to use. You can set them with a hash
let(:facts) { {:operatingsystem => 'Debian', :kernel => 'Linux', ...} }
You can also create a set of default facts provided to all specs in your spec_helper:
RSpec.configure do |c|
c.default_facts = {
:operatingsystem => 'Ubuntu'
}
end
Any facts you provide with let(:facts)
in a spec will automatically be merged on top
of the default facts.
I recommend setting a default module path by adding the following code to your
spec_helper.rb
RSpec.configure do |c|
c.module_path = '/path/to/your/module/dir'
end
However, if you want to specify it in each example, you can do so
let(:module_path) { '/path/to/your/module/dir' }
All of the standard RSpec matchers are available for you to use when testing Puppet functions.
it 'should be able to do something' do
subject.call(['foo']) == 'bar'
end
For your convenience though, a run
matcher exists to provide easier to
understand test cases.
it { should run.with_params('foo').and_return('bar') }
require 'spec_helper'
describe '<function name>' do
...
end
The name of the function must be provided in the top level description, e.g.
describe 'split' do
You can specify the arguments to pass to your function during the test(s) using
either the with_params
chain method in the run
matcher
it { should run.with_params('foo', 'bar', ['baz']) }
Or by using the call
method on the subject directly
it 'something' do
subject.call(['foo', 'bar', ['baz']])
end
You can test the result of a function (if it produces one) using either the
and_returns
chain method in the run
matcher
it { should run.with_params('foo').and_return('bar') }
Or by using any of the existing RSpec matchers on the subject directly
it 'something' do
subject.call(['foo']) == 'bar'
subject.call(['baz']).should be_an Array
end
You can test whether the function throws an exception using either the
and_raises_error
chain method in the run
matcher
it { should run.with_params('a', 'b').and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError) }
it { should_not run.with_params('a').and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError) }
Or by using the existing raises_error
RSpec matcher
it 'something' do
expect { subject.call(['a', 'b']) }.should raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
expect { subject.call(['a']) }.should_not raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
end
Set the hiera config symbol properly in your spec files:
let(:hiera_config) { 'spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml' }
hiera = Hiera.new(:config => 'spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml')
Create your spec hiera files
spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml
---
:backends:
- yaml
:hierarchy:
- test
:yaml:
:datadir: 'spec/fixtures/hiera'
spec/fixtures/hiera/test.yaml
---
ntpserver: ['ntp1.domain.com','ntpXX.domain.com']
user:
oneuser:
shell: '/bin/bash'
twouser:
shell: '/sbin/nologin'
ntpserver = hiera.lookup('ntpserver', nil, nil)
let(:params) { :ntpserver => ntpserver }
You can output a basic resource coverage report with the following in you spec file.
at_exit { RSpec::Puppet::Coverage.report! }
This checks which Puppet resources have been explicitly checked as part of the current test run and outputs both a coverage percentage and a list of untouched resources.