Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix GTPv2 flags #11

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 27, 2020
Merged

fix GTPv2 flags #11

merged 9 commits into from
Mar 27, 2020

Conversation

RoadRunnr
Copy link
Member

also fixup the property test to be more comprehensive

This meant that multiple instances of fixed length IEs where not
decoded with the proper instance id.
Not decoding them makes the property test fail.
proper generates a random value for integers. That does not
guarantee that the full range of the integer value is tested.
Include Min and Max explicitly to ensure the full range is covered.
GTPv1 does not have instance ids in the protocol. We derive them
while decoding from the IE ordering. To archive a symetric en/decoding
they have to be sequential, starting with 0.
Change the IE generation for GTPv1 and GTPprime to archive that.
Also, change the property test to always generate flags in definition
order. This makes comparing results from an encode-decode cycle simpler.
The test did first encode a message to binary and them check whether
and dec+enc on that binary returned the same binary.
If the initial encode already lost infromation (e.g. due to too small
data type) the dec+enc check would not catch that.
Instead compare the result of an enc+dec test to the original message.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.2%) to 67.345% when pulling 59eaa3e on fix/v2-flags into 18911a6 on master.

Copy link

@vijay-hirani vijay-hirani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved.

@mgumz mgumz merged commit a0e8d14 into master Mar 27, 2020
@mgumz mgumz deleted the fix/v2-flags branch March 27, 2020 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants