Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix NOTES from CITATION and vignettes
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
tpq committed Feb 1, 2017
1 parent baa2896 commit 12f53f1
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 14 additions and 8 deletions.
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions inst/CITATION
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ citEntry(entry = "Article",
as.person("Tamsyn Crowley")),
journal = "bioRxiv",
year = "2017",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/104935",

textVersion =
paste("Quinn T, Richardson MF, Lovell D, Crowley T (2017)",
Expand All @@ -29,7 +28,6 @@ citEntry(entry = "Article",
year = "2015",
volume = "11",
number = "3",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004075",

textVersion =
paste("Lovell D, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ,",
Expand All @@ -46,7 +44,6 @@ citEntry(entry = "Article",
year = "2016",
volume = "135",
number = "1",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12064-015-0220-8",

textVersion =
paste("Erb I, Notredame C (2016) How should we measure proportionality",
Expand Down
13 changes: 11 additions & 2 deletions vignettes/introduction.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -137,13 +137,16 @@ The following figures compare pairwise scatterplots for the absolute count data

```{r, fig.show = "hold"}
pairs(X)
```

```{r, fig.show = "hold"}
pairs(Y)
```

Next, we will see that when we do calculate correlation, the coefficients differ for the absolute and relative datasets. This further demonstrates the *spurious correlation*.

```{r, warning = FALSE}
cor(X)
suppressWarnings(cor(X))
cor(Y)
```

Expand All @@ -160,6 +163,9 @@ In the next figures, we compare pairwise scatterplots for the clr-transformed ab

```{r, fig.show = "hold"}
pairs(propr:::proprCLR(Y[, 1:4]))
```

```{r, fig.show = "hold"}
pairs(propr:::proprCLR(X))
```

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -190,6 +196,9 @@ The following figures compare pairwise scatterplots for alr-transformed relative

```{r, fig.show = "hold"}
pairs(propr:::proprALR(Y, ivar = 5))
```

```{r, fig.show = "hold"}
pairs(X[, 1:4])
```

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -230,6 +239,6 @@ Although we developed this package with biological count data in mind, many of t

## References

1. Erb, Ionas, and Cedric Notredame. “How Should We Measure Proportionality on Relative Gene Expression Data?” Theory in Biosciences = Theorie in Den Biowissenschaften 135, no. 12 (June 2016): 2136. \doi{10.1007/s12064-015-0220-8}.
1. Erb, Ionas, and Cedric Notredame. “How Should We Measure Proportionality on Relative Gene Expression Data?” Theory in Biosciences = Theorie in Den Biowissenschaften 135, no. 1-2 (June 2016): 21-36. \doi{10.1007/s12064-015-0220-8}.

2. Lovell, David, Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn, Juan José Egozcue, Samuel Marguerat, and Jürg Bähler. “Proportionality: A Valid Alternative to Correlation for Relative Data.” PLoS Computational Biology 11, no. 3 (March 2015): e1004075. \doi{10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004075}.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions vignettes/visualize.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -143,12 +143,12 @@ Although `propr` currently lacks a hypothesis testing framework, we believe that

## References

1. Erb, Ionas, and Cedric Notredame. “How Should We Measure Proportionality on Relative Gene Expression Data?” Theory in Biosciences = Theorie in Den Biowissenschaften 135, no. 12 (June 2016): 2136. \doi{10.1007/s12064-015-0220-8}.
1. Erb, Ionas, and Cedric Notredame. “How Should We Measure Proportionality on Relative Gene Expression Data?” Theory in Biosciences = Theorie in Den Biowissenschaften 135, no. 1-2 (June 2016): 21-36. \doi{10.1007/s12064-015-0220-8}.

2. Fernandes, Andrew D., Jennifer Ns Reid, Jean M. Macklaim, Thomas A. McMurrough, David R. Edgell, and Gregory B. Gloor. “Unifying the Analysis of High-Throughput Sequencing Datasets: Characterizing RNA-Seq, 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Selective Growth Experiments by Compositional Data Analysis.” Microbiome 2 (2014): 15. \doi{10.1186/2049-2618-2-15}.

3. Gloor, Gregory B., and Gregor Reid. “Compositional Analysis: A Valid Approach to Analyze Microbiome High-Throughput Sequencing Data.” Canadian Journal of Microbiology 62, no. 8 (August 2016): 692703. \doi{10.1139/cjm-2015-0821}.
3. Gloor, Gregory B., and Gregor Reid. “Compositional Analysis: A Valid Approach to Analyze Microbiome High-Throughput Sequencing Data.” Canadian Journal of Microbiology 62, no. 8 (August 2016): 692-703. \doi{10.1139/cjm-2015-0821}.

4. Lovell, David, Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn, Juan José Egozcue, Samuel Marguerat, and Jürg Bähler. “Proportionality: A Valid Alternative to Correlation for Relative Data.” PLoS Computational Biology 11, no. 3 (March 2015): e1004075. \doi{10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004075}.

5. Rollins, Lee A., Mark F. Richardson, and Richard Shine. “A Genetic Perspective on Rapid Evolution in Cane Toads (Rhinella Marina).” Molecular Ecology 24, no. 9 (May 2015): 226476. \doi{10.1111/mec.13184}.
5. Rollins, Lee A., Mark F. Richardson, and Richard Shine. “A Genetic Perspective on Rapid Evolution in Cane Toads (Rhinella Marina).” Molecular Ecology 24, no. 9 (May 2015): 2264-76. \doi{10.1111/mec.13184}.

0 comments on commit 12f53f1

Please sign in to comment.