Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/find in set expression #3

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 9, 2023

Conversation

hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tpetry ,
First, thanks for your package, it's very helpful for my working.
Sometime, I worked with FIND_IN_SET operator in MySQL so I want to contribute for this expression.
Plz take time to review it.

@tpetry
Copy link
Owner

tpetry commented Apr 8, 2023

Thanks for your contribution @hungthai1401. But it is not a good fit at the current implementation state.

The FIND_IN_SET function returns a match count for the search param. Only the MySQL implementation does that. So the meaning would have to be changed to something like StrListContains.

The FIND_IN_SET function would be case-insensitive and at least the PG one would be case sensitive. Maybe it would be a good approach to reimplement the functionality in the same way for all databases and let the user control the case sensitivity. But should it be case-sensitive or case-insensitive by default? Or has the sensitivity to be defined all the time?

The SQLite implementation is incorrect for these cases:

  • The match is the first element
  • The match is the last element
  • The match is the only element

@tpetry
Copy link
Owner

tpetry commented Apr 8, 2023

Btw you should use JSON columns instead as they don‘t have a problem with values containing , for the values. Its the much better approach.

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your suggestion @tpetry . I add strict mode in this expression for solve case-insensitive and case-sensitive.
I understand that is good if use JSON columns but as you know, some legacy projects didn't use JSON in schema

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @tpetry , are you here?

@tpetry
Copy link
Owner

tpetry commented Apr 11, 2023

I'll need some time to refactor your PR.

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll need some time to refactor your PR.

thank you so much @tpetry

@tpetry
Copy link
Owner

tpetry commented Apr 12, 2023

I'll delay merging this PR until laravel/framework#46558 is merged. The current implementation of query expressions can't use arbitrary strings in expressions due to SQL injection problems. Only with the PR to Laravel this class will be of use.

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tpetry I also follow your PR. Thank you for informing me

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tpetry I can see that you PR has been merged

@tpetry
Copy link
Owner

tpetry commented May 31, 2023

Yes, but you'll have to wait for a Laravel release that includes the PR and a few days for me to include your PR. But it will be available soon ;)

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tpetry I got it. thank you so much

@tpetry
Copy link
Owner

tpetry commented Jun 1, 2023

We'll have to wait another 2 weeks. My PR laravel/framework#47210 was merged shortly after the Laravel 10.13 release. We need that release to do this:

$query->where(new StringSetContains('type', new Value('blocked'))); 

I will polish your PR and prepare everything in the meantime. As soon as Laravel 10.14 is released I will then merge it.

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for your info. I am very eager to use this syntax

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tpetry Congratulation! Your PR has been released in v10.13.1

@tpetry tpetry merged commit 81efd16 into tpetry:main Jun 9, 2023
@tpetry
Copy link
Owner

tpetry commented Jun 9, 2023

This is now released with 0.5.0. Thanks for your contribution.

@hungthai1401
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tpetry thanks for your great package.

@hungthai1401 hungthai1401 deleted the feature/find_in_set_expression branch July 7, 2023 03:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants