-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix alignment of value in /proc/$pid/smaps #772
Conversation
Hi @ioquatix! Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel! Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch. Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process. Here's what to do:
How do I format my contribution?The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations. Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea. You can create patches with Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary. Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with. Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel. Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this. Where do I send my contribution?The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes. If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the
Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches. It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.) How do I send my contribution?Use For more information about using How do I get help if I'm stuck?Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed. Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine. If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:
If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers! I sent my patch - now what?You wait. You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at. Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:
Further information
Happy hacking! This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot. |
The /proc/$pid/smaps output has an alignment issue for the field FilePmdMapped and THPeligible. Increases the alignment of FilePmdMapped by 1 space, and converts the alignment of THPeligible to use spaces instead of tabs, to be consistent with the other fields. Signed-off-by: Samuel Williams <[email protected]>
This was submitted to the fsdevel mailing list. |
…do() dev->unlink_list is reused unless dev is deleted. So, list_del() should not be used. Due to using list_del(), dev->unlink_list can't be reused so that dev->nested_level update logic doesn't work. In order to fix this bug, list_del_init() should be used instead of list_del(). Test commands: ip link add bond0 type bond ip link add bond1 type bond ip link set bond0 master bond1 ip link set bond0 nomaster ip link set bond1 master bond0 ip link set bond1 nomaster Splat looks like: [ 255.750458][ T1030] ============================================ [ 255.751967][ T1030] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 255.753435][ T1030] 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#772 Not tainted [ 255.754553][ T1030] -------------------------------------------- [ 255.756047][ T1030] ip/1030 is trying to acquire lock: [ 255.757304][ T1030] ffff88811782a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.760056][ T1030] [ 255.760056][ T1030] but task is already holding lock: [ 255.761862][ T1030] ffff88811130a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.764581][ T1030] [ 255.764581][ T1030] other info that might help us debug this: [ 255.766645][ T1030] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 255.766645][ T1030] [ 255.768566][ T1030] CPU0 [ 255.769415][ T1030] ---- [ 255.770259][ T1030] lock(&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1); [ 255.771629][ T1030] lock(&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1); [ 255.772994][ T1030] [ 255.772994][ T1030] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 255.772994][ T1030] [ 255.775091][ T1030] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 255.775091][ T1030] [ 255.777182][ T1030] 2 locks held by ip/1030: [ 255.778299][ T1030] #0: ffffffffb1f63250 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2e4/0x8b0 [ 255.780600][ T1030] #1: ffff88811130a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.783411][ T1030] [ 255.783411][ T1030] stack backtrace: [ 255.784874][ T1030] CPU: 7 PID: 1030 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#772 [ 255.786595][ T1030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 255.789030][ T1030] Call Trace: [ 255.789850][ T1030] dump_stack+0x99/0xd0 [ 255.790882][ T1030] __lock_acquire.cold.71+0x166/0x3cc [ 255.792285][ T1030] ? register_lock_class+0x1a30/0x1a30 [ 255.793619][ T1030] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 [ 255.794963][ T1030] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0 [ 255.796246][ T1030] lock_acquire+0x1b8/0x850 [ 255.797332][ T1030] ? dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.798624][ T1030] ? bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.800039][ T1030] ? check_flags+0x50/0x50 [ 255.801143][ T1030] ? lock_contended+0xd80/0xd80 [ 255.802341][ T1030] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2e/0x70 [ 255.803592][ T1030] ? dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.804897][ T1030] dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.806168][ T1030] bond_enslave+0x3d58/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.807542][ T1030] ? __lock_acquire+0xe53/0x51b0 [ 255.808824][ T1030] ? bond_update_slave_arr+0xdc0/0xdc0 [bonding] [ 255.810451][ T1030] ? check_chain_key+0x236/0x5e0 [ 255.811742][ T1030] ? mutex_is_locked+0x13/0x50 [ 255.812910][ T1030] ? rtnl_is_locked+0x11/0x20 [ 255.814061][ T1030] ? netdev_master_upper_dev_get+0xf/0x120 [ 255.815553][ T1030] do_setlink+0x94c/0x3040 [ ... ] Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 1fc70ed ("net: core: add nested_level variable in net_device") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]>
…do() dev->unlink_list is reused unless dev is deleted. So, list_del() should not be used. Due to using list_del(), dev->unlink_list can't be reused so that dev->nested_level update logic doesn't work. In order to fix this bug, list_del_init() should be used instead of list_del(). Test commands: ip link add bond0 type bond ip link add bond1 type bond ip link set bond0 master bond1 ip link set bond0 nomaster ip link set bond1 master bond0 ip link set bond1 nomaster Splat looks like: [ 255.750458][ T1030] ============================================ [ 255.751967][ T1030] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 255.753435][ T1030] 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#772 Not tainted [ 255.754553][ T1030] -------------------------------------------- [ 255.756047][ T1030] ip/1030 is trying to acquire lock: [ 255.757304][ T1030] ffff88811782a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.760056][ T1030] [ 255.760056][ T1030] but task is already holding lock: [ 255.761862][ T1030] ffff88811130a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.764581][ T1030] [ 255.764581][ T1030] other info that might help us debug this: [ 255.766645][ T1030] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 255.766645][ T1030] [ 255.768566][ T1030] CPU0 [ 255.769415][ T1030] ---- [ 255.770259][ T1030] lock(&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1); [ 255.771629][ T1030] lock(&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1); [ 255.772994][ T1030] [ 255.772994][ T1030] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 255.772994][ T1030] [ 255.775091][ T1030] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 255.775091][ T1030] [ 255.777182][ T1030] 2 locks held by ip/1030: [ 255.778299][ T1030] #0: ffffffffb1f63250 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2e4/0x8b0 [ 255.780600][ T1030] #1: ffff88811130a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.783411][ T1030] [ 255.783411][ T1030] stack backtrace: [ 255.784874][ T1030] CPU: 7 PID: 1030 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#772 [ 255.786595][ T1030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 255.789030][ T1030] Call Trace: [ 255.789850][ T1030] dump_stack+0x99/0xd0 [ 255.790882][ T1030] __lock_acquire.cold.71+0x166/0x3cc [ 255.792285][ T1030] ? register_lock_class+0x1a30/0x1a30 [ 255.793619][ T1030] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 [ 255.794963][ T1030] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0 [ 255.796246][ T1030] lock_acquire+0x1b8/0x850 [ 255.797332][ T1030] ? dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.798624][ T1030] ? bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.800039][ T1030] ? check_flags+0x50/0x50 [ 255.801143][ T1030] ? lock_contended+0xd80/0xd80 [ 255.802341][ T1030] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2e/0x70 [ 255.803592][ T1030] ? dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.804897][ T1030] dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.806168][ T1030] bond_enslave+0x3d58/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.807542][ T1030] ? __lock_acquire+0xe53/0x51b0 [ 255.808824][ T1030] ? bond_update_slave_arr+0xdc0/0xdc0 [bonding] [ 255.810451][ T1030] ? check_chain_key+0x236/0x5e0 [ 255.811742][ T1030] ? mutex_is_locked+0x13/0x50 [ 255.812910][ T1030] ? rtnl_is_locked+0x11/0x20 [ 255.814061][ T1030] ? netdev_master_upper_dev_get+0xf/0x120 [ 255.815553][ T1030] do_setlink+0x94c/0x3040 [ ... ] Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 1fc70ed ("net: core: add nested_level variable in net_device") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
…do() commit 0e8b8d6 upstream. dev->unlink_list is reused unless dev is deleted. So, list_del() should not be used. Due to using list_del(), dev->unlink_list can't be reused so that dev->nested_level update logic doesn't work. In order to fix this bug, list_del_init() should be used instead of list_del(). Test commands: ip link add bond0 type bond ip link add bond1 type bond ip link set bond0 master bond1 ip link set bond0 nomaster ip link set bond1 master bond0 ip link set bond1 nomaster Splat looks like: [ 255.750458][ T1030] ============================================ [ 255.751967][ T1030] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 255.753435][ T1030] 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#772 Not tainted [ 255.754553][ T1030] -------------------------------------------- [ 255.756047][ T1030] ip/1030 is trying to acquire lock: [ 255.757304][ T1030] ffff88811782a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.760056][ T1030] [ 255.760056][ T1030] but task is already holding lock: [ 255.761862][ T1030] ffff88811130a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.764581][ T1030] [ 255.764581][ T1030] other info that might help us debug this: [ 255.766645][ T1030] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 255.766645][ T1030] [ 255.768566][ T1030] CPU0 [ 255.769415][ T1030] ---- [ 255.770259][ T1030] lock(&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1); [ 255.771629][ T1030] lock(&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1); [ 255.772994][ T1030] [ 255.772994][ T1030] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 255.772994][ T1030] [ 255.775091][ T1030] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 255.775091][ T1030] [ 255.777182][ T1030] 2 locks held by ip/1030: [ 255.778299][ T1030] #0: ffffffffb1f63250 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2e4/0x8b0 [ 255.780600][ T1030] #1: ffff88811130a280 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.783411][ T1030] [ 255.783411][ T1030] stack backtrace: [ 255.784874][ T1030] CPU: 7 PID: 1030 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8+ torvalds#772 [ 255.786595][ T1030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 255.789030][ T1030] Call Trace: [ 255.789850][ T1030] dump_stack+0x99/0xd0 [ 255.790882][ T1030] __lock_acquire.cold.71+0x166/0x3cc [ 255.792285][ T1030] ? register_lock_class+0x1a30/0x1a30 [ 255.793619][ T1030] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 [ 255.794963][ T1030] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0 [ 255.796246][ T1030] lock_acquire+0x1b8/0x850 [ 255.797332][ T1030] ? dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.798624][ T1030] ? bond_enslave+0x3d4d/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.800039][ T1030] ? check_flags+0x50/0x50 [ 255.801143][ T1030] ? lock_contended+0xd80/0xd80 [ 255.802341][ T1030] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2e/0x70 [ 255.803592][ T1030] ? dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.804897][ T1030] dev_mc_sync_multiple+0xc2/0x150 [ 255.806168][ T1030] bond_enslave+0x3d58/0x43e0 [bonding] [ 255.807542][ T1030] ? __lock_acquire+0xe53/0x51b0 [ 255.808824][ T1030] ? bond_update_slave_arr+0xdc0/0xdc0 [bonding] [ 255.810451][ T1030] ? check_chain_key+0x236/0x5e0 [ 255.811742][ T1030] ? mutex_is_locked+0x13/0x50 [ 255.812910][ T1030] ? rtnl_is_locked+0x11/0x20 [ 255.814061][ T1030] ? netdev_master_upper_dev_get+0xf/0x120 [ 255.815553][ T1030] do_setlink+0x94c/0x3040 [ ... ] Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 1fc70ed ("net: core: add nested_level variable in net_device") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #70: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:70: +static u8 halbtcoutsrc_IsBtCoexistAvailable(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#104: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:104: +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#117: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:117: +static void halbtcoutsrc_EnterLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#130: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:130: +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#152: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:152: +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#187: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:187: +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#196: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:196: +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisableLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bLowPwrDisable) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#205: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:205: +static void halbtcoutsrc_AggregationCheck(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#283: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:283: +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetWifiLinkStatus(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:311: +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetBtPatchVer(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#342: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:342: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:448: + struct RT_LINK_DETECT_T * plinkinfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#510: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:510: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#645: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:645: +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisplayFwPwrModeCmd(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#661: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:661: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#673: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:673: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#685: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:685: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#697: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:697: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#709: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:709: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#749: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:749: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#761: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:761: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist = (struct BTC_COEXIST *)pBtcContext; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#772: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:772: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #785: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:785: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#797: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:797: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:809: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#821: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:821: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#857: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:857: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#869: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:869: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#891: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:891: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist = &GLBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#917: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:917: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#963: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:963: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#975: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:975: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bWifiOnly) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#988: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:988: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1003: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1003: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1030: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1030: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1053: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1053: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1082: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1082: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 action) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1108: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1108: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, enum RT_MEDIA_STATUS mediaStatus) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1135: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1135: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pktType) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1166: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1166: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_BtInfoNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1184: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1184: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1197: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1197: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1213: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1213: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1258: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1258: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_DisplayBtCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]>
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #70: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:70: +static u8 halbtcoutsrc_IsBtCoexistAvailable(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#104: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:104: +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#117: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:117: +static void halbtcoutsrc_EnterLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#130: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:130: +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLps(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#152: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:152: +static void halbtcoutsrc_LeaveLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#187: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:187: +static void halbtcoutsrc_NormalLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#196: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:196: +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisableLowPower(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bLowPwrDisable) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#205: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:205: +static void halbtcoutsrc_AggregationCheck(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#283: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:283: +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetWifiLinkStatus(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:311: +static u32 halbtcoutsrc_GetBtPatchVer(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#342: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:342: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:448: + struct RT_LINK_DETECT_T * plinkinfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#510: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:510: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#645: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:645: +static void halbtcoutsrc_DisplayFwPwrModeCmd(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#661: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:661: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#673: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:673: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#685: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:685: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#697: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:697: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#709: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:709: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#749: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:749: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#761: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:761: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist = (struct BTC_COEXIST *)pBtcContext; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#772: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:772: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #785: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:785: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#797: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:797: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:809: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#821: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:821: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#857: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:857: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#869: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:869: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#891: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:891: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist = &GLBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#917: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:917: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#963: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:963: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#975: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:975: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bWifiOnly) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#988: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:988: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1003: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1003: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1030: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1030: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1053: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1053: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1082: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1082: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 action) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1108: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1108: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, enum RT_MEDIA_STATUS mediaStatus) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1135: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1135: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pktType) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1166: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1166: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_BtInfoNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1184: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1184: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1197: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1197: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1213: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1213: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1258: FILE: ./hal/hal_btcoex.c:1258: +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_DisplayBtCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
The
/proc/$pid/smaps
output has an alignment issue for the fieldFilePmdMapped
andTHPeligible
.This increases the alignment of
FilePmdMapped
by 1 space, and converts the alignment ofTHPeligible
to use spaces instead of tabs, to be consistent with the other fields.