-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge torvalds/linux:master #178
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Upgrading kernel to latest release
New commits to master
Pull request from torvalds/master (New commits - merge)
Updating working tree with torvalds:master
Updates from torvalds/master
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2015
This patch allows the LPFC to start up without a fatal kernel bug based on an exceeded KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE and a too large NR_CPU-based maskbits field. The bug was based on the number of CPU cores in a system. Using the get_cpu_mask() function declared in kernel/cpu.c allows the driver to load on the community kernel 4.2 RC1. Below is the kernel bug reproduced: 8<-------------------------------------------------------------------- 2199382.828437 ( 0.005216)| lpfc 0003:02:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) 2199382.999272 ( 0.170835)| ------------[ cut here ]------------ 2199382.999337 ( 0.000065)| WARNING: CPU: 84 PID: 404 at mm/slab_common.c:653 kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89() 2199383.004534 ( 0.005197)| Modules linked in: lpfc(+) usbcore(+) mptctl scsi_transport_fc sg lpc_ich i2c_i801 usb_common tpm_tis mfd_core tpm acpi_cpufreq button scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh_rdacusbcore: registered new device driver usb 2199383.020568 ( 0.016034)| 2199383.020581 ( 0.000013)| scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh gru thermal sata_nv processor piix fan thermal_sysehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver 2199383.035288 ( 0.014707)| 2199383.035306 ( 0.000018)| hwmon ata_piix 2199383.035336 ( 0.000030)| CPU: 84 PID: 404 Comm: kworker/84:0 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-gat-00106-ga7ca10f-dirty torvalds#178 2199383.047077 ( 0.011741)| ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver 2199383.047134 ( 0.000057)| Hardware name: SGI UV2000/ROMLEY, BIOS SGI UV 2000/3000 series BIOS 01/15/2013 2199383.056245 ( 0.009111)| Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn 2199383.066174 ( 0.009929)| 000000000000028d ffff88eef827bbe8 ffffffff815a542f 000000000000028d 2199383.069545 ( 0.003371)| ffffffff810ea142 ffff88eef827bc28 ffffffff8104365c ffff88eefe4006c8 2199383.076214 ( 0.006669)| 0000000000000000 00000000000080d0 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 2199383.079213 ( 0.002999)| Call Trace: 2199383.084084 ( 0.004871)| [<ffffffff815a542f>] dump_stack+0x49/0x62 2199383.087283 ( 0.003199)| [<ffffffff810ea142>] ? kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89 2199383.091415 ( 0.004132)| [<ffffffff8104365c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0x92 2199383.095197 ( 0.003782)| [<ffffffff8104368c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17 2199383.103336 ( 0.008139)| [<ffffffff810ea142>] kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89 2199383.107082 ( 0.003746)| [<ffffffff8110fd9e>] __kmalloc+0x13/0x16a 2199383.112531 ( 0.005449)| [<ffffffffa01a8ed9>] lpfc_pci_probe_one_s4+0x105b/0x1644 [lpfc] 2199383.115316 ( 0.002785)| [<ffffffff81302b92>] ? pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x75/0x87 2199383.123431 ( 0.008115)| [<ffffffffa01a951f>] lpfc_pci_probe_one+0x5d/0xcb5 [lpfc] 2199383.127364 ( 0.003933)| [<ffffffff81497119>] ? dbs_check_cpu+0x168/0x177 2199383.136438 ( 0.009074)| [<ffffffff81496fa5>] ? gov_queue_work+0xb4/0xc0 2199383.140407 ( 0.003969)| [<ffffffff8130b2a1>] local_pci_probe+0x1e/0x52 2199383.143105 ( 0.002698)| [<ffffffff81052c47>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x13/0x1b 2199383.147315 ( 0.004210)| [<ffffffff81054965>] process_one_work+0x222/0x35e 2199383.151379 ( 0.004064)| [<ffffffff81054e76>] worker_thread+0x3d5/0x46e 2199383.159402 ( 0.008023)| [<ffffffff81054aa1>] ? process_one_work+0x35e/0x35e 2199383.163097 ( 0.003695)| [<ffffffff810599c6>] kthread+0xc8/0xd2 2199383.167476 ( 0.004379)| [<ffffffff810598fe>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x5b/0x5b 2199383.176434 ( 0.008958)| [<ffffffff815a8cac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 2199383.180086 ( 0.003652)| [<ffffffff810598fe>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x5b/0x5b 2199383.192333 ( 0.012247)| ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: EHCI Host Controller -------------------------------------------------------------------->8 The proposed solution was approved by James Smart at Emulex and tested on a UV2 machine with 6144 cores. With the fix, the LPFC module loads with no unwanted effects on the system. Signed-off-by: Ian Mitchell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Thorlton <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Robert Elliot <[email protected]> [james.smart: resolve unused variable warning] Signed-off-by: James Smart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2015
The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2015
The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2016
The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
jforissier
pushed a commit
to jforissier/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2016
…ssue fix: Only 720p reset dsi when detect dsi transfer error
ddstreet
pushed a commit
to ddstreet/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2016
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540532 commit 715780a upstream. The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Noltari
pushed a commit
to Noltari/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2016
commit c0365c0 upstream. This patch allows the LPFC to start up without a fatal kernel bug based on an exceeded KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE and a too large NR_CPU-based maskbits field. The bug was based on the number of CPU cores in a system. Using the get_cpu_mask() function declared in kernel/cpu.c allows the driver to load on the community kernel 4.2 RC1. Below is the kernel bug reproduced: 8<-------------------------------------------------------------------- 2199382.828437 ( 0.005216)| lpfc 0003:02:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) 2199382.999272 ( 0.170835)| ------------[ cut here ]------------ 2199382.999337 ( 0.000065)| WARNING: CPU: 84 PID: 404 at mm/slab_common.c:653 kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89() 2199383.004534 ( 0.005197)| Modules linked in: lpfc(+) usbcore(+) mptctl scsi_transport_fc sg lpc_ich i2c_i801 usb_common tpm_tis mfd_core tpm acpi_cpufreq button scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh_rdacusbcore: registered new device driver usb 2199383.020568 ( 0.016034)| 2199383.020581 ( 0.000013)| scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh gru thermal sata_nv processor piix fan thermal_sysehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver 2199383.035288 ( 0.014707)| 2199383.035306 ( 0.000018)| hwmon ata_piix 2199383.035336 ( 0.000030)| CPU: 84 PID: 404 Comm: kworker/84:0 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-gat-00106-ga7ca10f-dirty torvalds#178 2199383.047077 ( 0.011741)| ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver 2199383.047134 ( 0.000057)| Hardware name: SGI UV2000/ROMLEY, BIOS SGI UV 2000/3000 series BIOS 01/15/2013 2199383.056245 ( 0.009111)| Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn 2199383.066174 ( 0.009929)| 000000000000028d ffff88eef827bbe8 ffffffff815a542f 000000000000028d 2199383.069545 ( 0.003371)| ffffffff810ea142 ffff88eef827bc28 ffffffff8104365c ffff88eefe4006c8 2199383.076214 ( 0.006669)| 0000000000000000 00000000000080d0 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 2199383.079213 ( 0.002999)| Call Trace: 2199383.084084 ( 0.004871)| [<ffffffff815a542f>] dump_stack+0x49/0x62 2199383.087283 ( 0.003199)| [<ffffffff810ea142>] ? kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89 2199383.091415 ( 0.004132)| [<ffffffff8104365c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0x92 2199383.095197 ( 0.003782)| [<ffffffff8104368c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17 2199383.103336 ( 0.008139)| [<ffffffff810ea142>] kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89 2199383.107082 ( 0.003746)| [<ffffffff8110fd9e>] __kmalloc+0x13/0x16a 2199383.112531 ( 0.005449)| [<ffffffffa01a8ed9>] lpfc_pci_probe_one_s4+0x105b/0x1644 [lpfc] 2199383.115316 ( 0.002785)| [<ffffffff81302b92>] ? pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x75/0x87 2199383.123431 ( 0.008115)| [<ffffffffa01a951f>] lpfc_pci_probe_one+0x5d/0xcb5 [lpfc] 2199383.127364 ( 0.003933)| [<ffffffff81497119>] ? dbs_check_cpu+0x168/0x177 2199383.136438 ( 0.009074)| [<ffffffff81496fa5>] ? gov_queue_work+0xb4/0xc0 2199383.140407 ( 0.003969)| [<ffffffff8130b2a1>] local_pci_probe+0x1e/0x52 2199383.143105 ( 0.002698)| [<ffffffff81052c47>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x13/0x1b 2199383.147315 ( 0.004210)| [<ffffffff81054965>] process_one_work+0x222/0x35e 2199383.151379 ( 0.004064)| [<ffffffff81054e76>] worker_thread+0x3d5/0x46e 2199383.159402 ( 0.008023)| [<ffffffff81054aa1>] ? process_one_work+0x35e/0x35e 2199383.163097 ( 0.003695)| [<ffffffff810599c6>] kthread+0xc8/0xd2 2199383.167476 ( 0.004379)| [<ffffffff810598fe>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x5b/0x5b 2199383.176434 ( 0.008958)| [<ffffffff815a8cac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 2199383.180086 ( 0.003652)| [<ffffffff810598fe>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x5b/0x5b 2199383.192333 ( 0.012247)| ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: EHCI Host Controller -------------------------------------------------------------------->8 The proposed solution was approved by James Smart at Emulex and tested on a UV2 machine with 6144 cores. With the fix, the LPFC module loads with no unwanted effects on the system. Signed-off-by: Ian Mitchell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Thorlton <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Robert Elliot <[email protected]> [james.smart: resolve unused variable warning] Signed-off-by: James Smart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
laijs
pushed a commit
to laijs/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2017
Various cleanups + timer fixes and optimizations
alaahl
pushed a commit
to alaahl/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2019
The sysfs layout is created by CM incorrectly presented RDMA devices with InfiniBand link layer. Layout of such devices represents device tree of connections. By moving CM statistics to be under relevant port of IB device, we will fix the following issues: * Symlink name - It used device name instead of specific identifier. * Target location - It was supposed to point to PCI-ID/infiniband_cm/ instead of PCI-ID/infiniband/ * Target name - It created extra device file under already existing device folder, e.g. mlx5_0/mlx5_0 * Crash during boot with RDMA persistent naming patches. sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/infiniband_cm/mlx5_0' CPU: 29 PID: 433 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.0.0-rc5+ torvalds#178 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xcc/0x180 sysfs_warn_dup.cold.3+0x17/0x2d sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.2+0xd0/0xf0 device_add+0x7cb/0x1450 device_create_groups_vargs+0x1ae/0x220 device_create+0x93/0xc0 cm_add_one+0x38f/0xf60 [ib_cm] add_client_context+0x167/0x210 [ib_core] enable_device_and_get+0x230/0x3f0 [ib_core] ib_register_device+0x823/0xbf0 [ib_core] __mlx5_ib_add+0x45/0x150 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_add+0x1b3/0x5e0 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_add_device+0x130/0x3a0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_register_interface+0x1a9/0x270 [mlx5_core] do_one_initcall+0x14f/0x5de do_init_module+0x247/0x7c0 load_module+0x4c2f/0x60d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe After this change: [leonro@server ~]$ ls -al /sys/class/infiniband/ibp0s12f0/ports/1/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 11 11:17 cm_rx_duplicates drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 11 11:17 cm_rx_msgs drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 11 11:17 cm_tx_msgs drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 11 11:17 cm_tx_retries Fixes: 110cf37 ("infiniband: make cm_device use a struct device and not a kobject.") Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2020
commit 715780a upstream. The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2020
commit 715780a upstream. The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Noltari
pushed a commit
to Noltari/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2020
commit 715780a upstream. The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mrchapp
pushed a commit
to mrchapp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2020
commit 715780a upstream. The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
lag-linaro
pushed a commit
to lag-linaro/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2020
commit 715780a upstream. The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Change-Id: I507ba106376e7a5397cf587bb4dd9239841392d6
lag-linaro
pushed a commit
to lag-linaro/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2020
commit 715780a upstream. The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 torvalds#178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Change-Id: I507ba106376e7a5397cf587bb4dd9239841392d6
otavio
added a commit
to OSSystems/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2021
Update 5.4.x+fslc to v5.4.79
chombourger
pushed a commit
to chombourger/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2021
…from plsdk-2753 to processor-sdk-linux-4.19.y * commit 'e4d2539dc6149139c02223b99ff5412fd07707a4': net: ethernet: ti: ptp_bc: allow PTP sync enable when PTP BC is disabled
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#170: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:170: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#171: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:171: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#172: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:172: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#173: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:173: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#174: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:174: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#175: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:175: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#176: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:176: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#177: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:177: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#178: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:178: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#180: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:180: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#182: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:182: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#183: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:183: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#184: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:184: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#185: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:185: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#170: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:170: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#171: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:171: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#172: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:172: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#173: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:173: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#174: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:174: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#175: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:175: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#176: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:176: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#177: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:177: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#178: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:178: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#180: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:180: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#182: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:182: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#183: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:183: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#184: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:184: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#185: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.h:185: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2021
For functions with variable arguments like: void set_worker_desc(const char *fmt, ...) the BTF data contains void argument at the end: [4061] FUNC_PROTO '(anon)' ret_type_id=0 vlen=2 'fmt' type_id=3 '(anon)' type_id=0 When attaching function with this void argument the btf_distill_func_proto will set last btf_func_model's argument with size 0 and that will cause extra loop in save_regs/restore_regs functions and generate trampoline code like: 55 push %rbp 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp 53 push %rbx 48 89 7d f0 mov %rdi,-0x10(%rbp) 75 f8 jne 0xffffffffa00cf007 ^^^ extra jump It's causing soft lockups/crashes probably depends on what context is the attached function called, like for set_worker_desc: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#16 stuck for 22s! [kworker/u40:4:239] CPU: 16 PID: 239 Comm: kworker/u40:4 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4qemu+ torvalds#178 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-1.fc33 04/01/2014 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn RIP: 0010:bpf_trampoline_6442464853_0+0xa/0x1000 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffa3597fe0. RSP: 0018:ffffc90000687da8 EFLAGS: 00000217 Call Trace: set_worker_desc+0x5/0xb0 wb_workfn+0x48/0x4d0 ? psi_group_change+0x41/0x210 ? __bpf_prog_exit+0x15/0x20 ? bpf_trampoline_6442458903_0+0x3b/0x1000 ? update_pasid+0x5/0x90 ? __switch_to+0x187/0x450 process_one_work+0x1e7/0x380 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 ? rescuer_thread+0x380/0x380 kthread+0x11b/0x140 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 This patch is removing the void argument from struct btf_func_model in btf_distill_func_proto, but perhaps we should also check for this in JIT's save_regs/restore_regs functions. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
nareshkamboju
pushed a commit
to nareshkamboju/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
nareshkamboju
pushed a commit
to nareshkamboju/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2021
[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
intersectRaven
pushed a commit
to intersectRaven/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2021
[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
snajpa
pushed a commit
to vpsfreecz/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2021
[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Kaz205
pushed a commit
to Kaz205/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2021
[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== torvalds#45: core_reloc: insn torvalds#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#46: core_reloc: insn torvalds#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#47: core_reloc: insn torvalds#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#48: core_reloc: insn torvalds#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#49: core_reloc: insn torvalds#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== torvalds#30: core_reloc: insn torvalds#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 torvalds#31: core_reloc: insn torvalds#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jackpot51
referenced
this pull request
in pop-os/linux
Jun 22, 2021
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929455 [ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.