Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support/wagtail 50 #1

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Support/wagtail 50 #1

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

lparsons396
Copy link

  • Support Wagtail 5.1

tox.ini Outdated
py{38,39,310}-django{3.2,4.1}-wagtail{4.1,4.2,5.0}
py{311}-django{4.1}-wagtail{4.1,4.2,5.0}
py{311}-django{4.2}-wagtail{5.0}
py{38,39,310}-django{3.2,4.1}-wagtail{4.1,4.2,5.0,5.1}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since we only support LTS and the last 2 non-LTS releases, 4.2 should drop from the list
https://endoflife.date/wagtail

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gotcha, thanks for pointing me in the direction of endoflife too

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0

## [Unreleased]

- Add Wagtail 5.1 support
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Add Wagtail 5.1 support
- Make Wagtail 5.1 support official

tox.ini Outdated
py{38,39,310}-django{3.2,4.1}-wagtail{4.1,4.2,5.0}
py{311}-django{4.1}-wagtail{4.1,4.2,5.0}
py{311}-django{4.2}-wagtail{5.0}
py{38,39,310}-django{3.2,4.1}-wagtail{4.2,5.0,5.1}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wagtail 4.1 is the LTS version. 4.2 is the one that needs dropping

@zerolab
Copy link

zerolab commented Oct 19, 2023

@lparsons396 soo... I just noticed this PR is against torchbox-forks, rather than the actual repository 🙈

It would be great if you could open the PR against https://github.com/torchbox/wagtail-headless-preview as that is where it belongs ;)

Copy link
Collaborator

@nickmoreton nickmoreton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lparsons396 Looks good, I approve.

@zerolab
Copy link

zerolab commented Oct 24, 2023

torchbox#50 was already merged.

In the future, for our repos (i.e. in https://github.com/torchbox/) can we please always open a PR against the main repo rather than on the fork

@nickmoreton
Copy link
Collaborator

torchbox#50 was already merged.

In the future, for our repos (i.e. in https://github.com/torchbox/) can we please always open a PR against the main repo rather than on the fork

Thanks @zerolab it makes sense. I'll need to communicate that somehow, are you likely to code review them or could it be someone else?

@zerolab
Copy link

zerolab commented Oct 24, 2023

It helps having someone else do a code review, but it is the maintainer's job to do a final one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants