Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backport several non-breaking changes to v0.1.x #1139

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

hawkw
Copy link
Member

@hawkw hawkw commented Dec 14, 2020

This branch backports a number of non-breaking changes from master to
v0.1.x:

These changes have already been approved on master, so I'll just go
ahead and merge this once CI passes.

I'll rebase merge this so all the commits land individually.

mraerino and others added 4 commits December 14, 2020 11:02
## Motivation

At Netlify we recently introduced native Rust support in the build
system: netlify/build-image#477

## Solution

This PR cleans up the Netlify build config to use a more
straight-forward way of building rust docs.

This also introduces a workaround for
netlify/build-image#505

## Kudos

We're big fans of the `tracing` crate at Netlify and using it for many
new systems recently. Very happy we can give something back!

Closes #1130
…nv_logger compat) (#1126)

Hi Folks,

This PR is about behavior compatibility with the `env_logger` and `log`
crates. There are references in the `tracing-subscriber` docs noting
some level of partial compatibility with `env_logger`, but it is not
clear to me the extent to which that is a priority.

If the intention is to keep the projects close in behavior where there
is overlap in the representations of logging directive strings, then
this PR is a step toward better compatibility.

On the other hand, if such compatibility is more of a short-term
nice-to-have than a long-term objective, then this PR might be a step in
the wrong direction. If so, please feel free to reject it. I happened to
notice the behavior difference (described below) while working on
something else, and just thought I'd bring it up for discussion.

On the *other* other hand, it is clear that some significant effort
*has* been expended to have compatibly parsed logging directive strings.
Which leads me to read the regex code modified in the second commit of
this PR as possibly introducing a level of compatibility that was
deliberately omitted; the existing regex was clearly structured to
accept *only* all uppercase OR *only* all lowercase log level names. So
I'm getting mixed signals :-)

In the end, regardless of the specific outcome of this PR, understanding
the degree to which `env_logger` compatibility is wanted would be useful
to know in general.

For my own use, `env_logger` compatibility is not something I need.


## Motivation

Logging directive strings parsed to create
`tracing_subscriber::filter::env::Directive`s are currently accepted as
all-lower-case or all-upper-case representations of the log level names
(like "info" and "INFO"), but mixed case representation (like "Info",
"iNfo", and "infO") are rejected.

This behavior is divergent with that of the `env_logger` crate, which
accepts the mixed case names. The `env_logger` crate gets the behavior
of parsing mixed case log level names from the underlying `log` crate,
so there may be an element of user expectations involved in that regard,
too, with `log` users expecting that case-insensitive log level names
will be accepted.

Accepting mixed case names would bring the behavior of the
`tracing_subscriber` crate back into alignment those other crates in
this regard.


## Solution

Accept mixed case names for log levels in directive strings.

This PR includes two commits:

   1. The first adds unit tests that demonstrate the mixed case logging
   level names being rejected.

   2. The second introduces an adjustment to `DIRECTIVE_RE` that accepts
   mixed case logging level names. With this change, the tests again all
   pass.

* [1 of 2]: subscriber: add more parse_directives* tests

These test parse_directives() against strings that contain only a
legit log level name. The variants that submit the mixed case forms
are currently failing:

    $ cargo test --lib 'filter::env::directive::test::parse_directives_'
    ...
    failures:
        filter::env::directive::test::parse_directives_global_bare_warn_mixed
        filter::env::directive::test::parse_directives_ralith_mixed

    test result: FAILED. 12 passed; 2 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 61 filtered out

Fix to come in a follow-up commit.

Co-authored-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
 Signed-off-by: Alan D. Salewski <[email protected]>

* [2 of 2]: subscriber: directives: accept log levels in mixed case

Fix issue demonstrated by unit tests in commit f607b7f. With
this commit, the unit tests all pass.

The 'DIRECTIVE_RE' regex now uses a case-insensitive, non-capturing
subgroup when matching log level names in logging directive
strings. This allows correctly capturing not only, e.g., "info" and
"INFO" (both of which were also accepted previously), but also
"Info" and other combinations of mixed case variations for the legit
log level names.

This change makes the behavior of tracing-subscriber more consistent
with that of the `env_logger` crate, which also accepts mixed case
variations of the log level names.

Co-authored-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
 Signed-off-by: Alan D. Salewski <[email protected]>
Update the closing-spans link.
We should allow configuring whether or not to display module_path
or file/line in output.

Co-authored-by: 李小鹏 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
@hawkw hawkw requested review from yaahc and a team as code owners December 14, 2020 19:05
@hawkw hawkw self-assigned this Dec 14, 2020
hawkw and others added 2 commits December 14, 2020 11:07
## Motivation

Tracing's examples depend on a number of external crates that the core
`tracing` crates don't depend on. Sometimes, crates that we only depend
on for examples will break compatibility with our MSRV. It's not ideal
to bump our supported MSRV just for an example, since the actual
`tracing` crates will still build fine.

## Solution

Instead, this PR updates the CI config to exclude examples from the
MSRV check. This way, we don't have to bump MSRV for examples-only
dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
## Motivation

Fixes the race condition outlined in #1120 . 

## Solution

`Worker` now uses a 2 stage shutdown approach. The first shutdown signal
is sent through the main message channel to the `Worker` from
`WorkerGuard` when it is dropped. Then `WorkerGuard` sends a second
signal on a second channel that is zero-capacity. This means It will
only succeed a `send()` when a `recv()` is called on the other end. This
guarantees that the `Worker` has flushed all it's messages before the
`WorkerGuard` can continue with its drop.

With this solution I'm not able to reproduce the race anymore using the
provided code sample from #1120 

Co-authored-by: Zeki Sherif <[email protected]>
@hawkw hawkw merged commit 9cb829f into v0.1.x Dec 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants