-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests: fix SB violation in LeakedBuffers #5322
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
``` error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <335802> for Unique permission at alloc141485[0x0], but that tag does not exist in the borrow stack for this location --> tokio/tests/support/leaked_buffers.rs:24:9 | 24 | slice | ^^^^^ | | | trying to retag from <335802> for Unique permission at alloc141485[0x0], but that tag does not exist in the borrow stack for this location | this error occurs as part of retag at alloc141485[0x0..0xa] | = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information help: <335802> was created by a Unique retag at offsets [0x0..0xa] --> tokio/tests/support/leaked_buffers.rs:22:21 | 22 | let slice = std::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(new_mem.as_mut_ptr(), new_mem.len()); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: <335802> was later invalidated at offsets [0x0..0xa] by a Unique retag --> tokio/tests/support/leaked_buffers.rs:23:31 | 23 | self.leaked_vecs.push(new_mem); | ^^^^^^^ = note: BACKTRACE (of the first span): = note: inside `support::leaked_buffers::LeakedBuffers::create::<'_>` at tokio/tests/support/leaked_buffers.rs:24:9: 24:14 note: inside `<BadAsyncRead as tokio::io::AsyncRead>::poll_read` --> tokio/tests/io_read.rs:63:38 | 63 | *buf = ReadBuf::new(unsafe { self.leaked_buffers.create(buf.capacity()) }); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside `<&mut BadAsyncRead as tokio::io::AsyncRead>::poll_read` --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/io/async_read.rs:77:5 | 77 | deref_async_read!(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside `<tokio::io::util::read_buf::ReadBuf<'_, BadAsyncRead, std::vec::Vec<u8>> as std::future::Future>::poll` --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/io/util/read_buf.rs:57:20 | 57 | ready!(Pin::new(me.reader).poll_read(cx, &mut buf)?); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside closure --> tokio/tests/io_read.rs:74:43 | 74 | BadAsyncRead::new().read_buf(&mut buf).await.unwrap(); | ^^^^^^ = note: inside `<std::pin::Pin<&mut dyn std::future::Future<Output = ()>> as std::future::Future>::poll` at /home/runner/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-2022-12-27-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/future/future.rs:124:9: 124:61 = note: inside `<std::pin::Pin<&mut std::pin::Pin<&mut dyn std::future::Future<Output = ()>>> as std::future::Future>::poll` at /home/runner/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-2022-12-27-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/future/future.rs:124:9: 124:61 note: inside closure --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/scheduler/current_thread.rs:541:57 | 541 | crate::runtime::coop::budget(|| future.as_mut().poll(&mut cx)) | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside `tokio::runtime::coop::with_budget::<std::task::Poll<()>, [closure@tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard<'_>::block_on<std::pin::Pin<&mut std::pin::Pin<&mut dyn std::future::Future<Output = ()>>>>::{closure#0}::{closure#0}::{closure#0}]>` --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/coop.rs:102:5 | 102 | f() | ^^^ note: inside `tokio::runtime::coop::budget::<std::task::Poll<()>, [closure@tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard<'_>::block_on<std::pin::Pin<&mut std::pin::Pin<&mut dyn std::future::Future<Output = ()>>>>::{closure#0}::{closure#0}::{closure#0}]>` --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/coop.rs:68:5 | 68 | with_budget(Budget::initial(), f) | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside closure --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/scheduler/current_thread.rs:541:25 | 541 | crate::runtime::coop::budget(|| future.as_mut().poll(&mut cx)) | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside `tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::Context::enter::<std::task::Poll<()>, [closure@tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard<'_>::block_on<std::pin::Pin<&mut std::pin::Pin<&mut dyn std::future::Future<Output = ()>>>>::{closure#0}::{closure#0}]>` --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/scheduler/current_thread.rs:350:19 | 350 | let ret = f(); | ^^^ note: inside closure --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/scheduler/current_thread.rs:540:36 | 540 | let (c, res) = context.enter(core, || { | ____________________________________^ 541 | | crate::runtime::coop::budget(|| future.as_mut().poll(&mut cx)) 542 | | }); | |______________________^ note: inside closure --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/scheduler/current_thread.rs:615:57 | 615 | let (core, ret) = CURRENT.set(&self.context, || f(core, &self.context)); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside `tokio::macros::scoped_tls::ScopedKey::<tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::Context>::set::<[closure@tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard<'_>::enter<[closure@tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard<'_>::block_on<std::pin::Pin<&mut std::pin::Pin<&mut dyn std::future::Future<Output = ()>>>>::{closure#0}], std::option::Option<()>>::{closure#0}], (std::boxed::Box<tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::Core>, std::option::Option<()>)>` --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/macros/scoped_tls.rs:61:9 | 61 | f() | ^^^ note: inside `tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard::<'_>::enter::<[closure@tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard<'_>::block_on<std::pin::Pin<&mut std::pin::Pin<&mut dyn std::future::Future<Output = ()>>>>::{closure#0}], std::option::Option<()>>` --> /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/tokio/src/runtime/scheduler/current_thread.rs:615:27 | 615 | let (core, ret) = CURRENT.set(&self.context, || f(core, &self.context)); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside `read_buf_bad_async_read` --> tokio/tests/io_read.rs:74:5 | 74 | BadAsyncRead::new().read_buf(&mut buf).await.unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: inside closure --> tokio/tests/io_read.rs:72:36 | 70 | #[tokio::test] | -------------- in this procedural macro expansion 71 | #[should_panic] 72 | async fn read_buf_bad_async_read() { | ^ = note: this error originates in the macro `deref_async_read` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `tokio::test` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace error: aborting due to previous error error: test failed, to rerun pass `--test io_read` Caused by: process didn't exit successfully: `/home/runner/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-2022-12-27-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/cargo-miri runner /home/runner/work/tokio/tokio/target/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/io_read-9a80d00f6027f2d9` (exit status: 1) ```
This reverts commit 335b7db.
Reverted nightly toolchain bump for now because it triggered another SB violation (#5317 (comment) -- Is it fine to suppress the error in the way I mentioned there for now?). |
Darksonn
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Split from #5317.
This fixes SB violation in test helper (LeakedBuffers).
(
--test io_take -- bad_reader_fails
also trigger this.)output