Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
util: implement
ReusableBoxFuture
with one function #4675util: implement
ReusableBoxFuture
with one function #4675Changes from 4 commits
3b19fd1
8e725bf
28382d4
2cbe991
8a12532
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this appears to be the only place where
reuse_pin_box
is ever called...do you think it would make sense to just put that code in this function? that way we avoid having an additional function that gets monomorphized over a big pile of generic types, which might help with binary size a bit...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Conceptually I quite like the idea of
reuse_pin_box
as an independent futures-unaware utility function — it makes a lot of sense to me as a layer of abstraction. Would putting#[inline(always)]
on the function have the same effect?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My guess is that it'll be inlined either way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think it'll get inlined either way.
I'm not strongly opposed to keeping the separate function; I just wanted to note that it isn't currently used elsewhere. 🤷♀️