Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split STYLEGUIDE out from CONTRIBUTING.md #1594

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Split STYLEGUIDE out from CONTRIBUTING.md #1594

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

iamam34
Copy link
Contributor

@iamam34 iamam34 commented Oct 28, 2017

Comments, edits, suggestions and questions welcome! Specifically, do we want to move some of STYLEGUIDE.md back into the main CONTRIBUTING.md document?

I've been inspired to contribute as part of Hacktoberfest 2017.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 28, 2017

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@agnivade
Copy link
Member

This is a non-trivial PR. I think the primary idea was to have an addendum sort of thing apart from the CONTRIBUTING.md. So that, normal users can read CONTRIBUTING.md and just be fine with it, and hardcore users can read the extra document.

You have taken out the formatting part and made it into a separate doc. Ideally I wouldn't want anything removed from CONTRIBUTING.md and just a link to the auxiliary page with the extra added guidelines.

Please wait for @waldyrious to take a look and comment on this.

@sbrl
Copy link
Member

sbrl commented Oct 28, 2017

Thanks for the PR! This is a rather interesting issue, as we'd like to keep at least something in CONTRIBUTING.md. Perhaps we can put a summary in CONTRIBUTING, and link to the style guide for more information? I certainly agree that a style guide would be useful though.

@waldyrious - what do you think?

@iamam34
Copy link
Contributor Author

iamam34 commented Oct 29, 2017

A summary in CONTRIBUTING sounds like a good idea; it seems like I should wait for comments from @waldyrious before going ahead with it.
What do you mean by "auxiliary" guidelines? Are there any parts of the current CONTRIBUTING.md that could be considered auxiliary?

@agnivade
Copy link
Member

What do you mean by "auxiliary" guidelines?

That was the whole point of #1508. There are several guidelines which are not explicitly written down anywhere. Just something we have been using. Like not using tokens in the description, not referring to a person directly with "you".

You wouldn't know these until you have been a member of the org for several years. Hence, my suggestion to wait until @waldyrious takes a look at it.

@iamam34
Copy link
Contributor Author

iamam34 commented Oct 29, 2017

@agnivade I understand that I don't know any of the community's unspoken guidelines, but my intent with this PR was to create a space for y'all to add to as time goes on.

@agnivade agnivade added the documentation Issues/PRs modifying the documentation. label Nov 5, 2017
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 13, 2017

Hi all! This thread has not had any recent activity. Are there any updates? Thanks!

@stale stale bot added the waiting Issues/PRs with Pending response by the author. label Nov 13, 2017
@agnivade agnivade removed the waiting Issues/PRs with Pending response by the author. label Nov 13, 2017
@waldyrious waldyrious closed this Nov 25, 2017
@waldyrious
Copy link
Member

waldyrious commented Nov 25, 2017

Please accept my deepest apologies for the delay, @iamam34. Your contribution is very much appreciated :)

After discussing with the other maintainers on Gitter (transcript available here), we decided to preserve some of the content in CONTRIBUTING.md, in preparation for further reorganization of these documents. I took the liberty to rebase this branch to include these changes so that we can merge your PR sooner rather than later.

You'll get pinged to comment on the upcoming PR, but in the meantime, if you have any comments about the resolution of this PR, let us know :)

@waldyrious
Copy link
Member

waldyrious commented Nov 25, 2017

Ah, crap. It looks like editing fork branches on PRs doesn't work very well when the PR branch is the primary one of the fork, as was the case here. Sorry about that. I'll open a new PR, but the commits should remain attributed to @iamam34.

@waldyrious
Copy link
Member

Notes for future reference:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Issues/PRs modifying the documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants