-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
support for azure key vault #158
Comments
It's not high priority at the moment, but if you can contribute we'll help review your code. |
Yes it is. |
Yes, absolutely.
…On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:08 AM 99M8 ***@***.***> wrote:
Great. Then I would love to take it on. Is it ok, @thaidn
<https://github.com/thaidn> ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#158 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAdbPk0-a02qRud3qELOrOYNV0EPZ-Iks5vadV8gaJpZM4YefRa>
.
|
Hi @99M8 , are you still interested in contributing? |
Closing for now, as we don't have resources to work on it, but potential contributors are encouraged to re-open. |
asking theoretically, what size would this task be, M, L? |
It's similar to #405. |
Hey @thaidn, |
Over the years we found several reason to redesign our KMS integration. I will leave this open for now though -- but we should first do the redesign. |
Thanks Thomas. If the reasons are written down somewhere, I'd be curious to see them for my own understanding. My two cents - without Azure support, there's a whole swatch of multi-cloud users that won't adopt Tink. |
Hi, did the redesign happen? If not, are you still open to accept Azure Key Vault integration with the current design? |
We don't plan this and I will close this. The issue is that maintaining these integrations is not trivial. Furthermore, an implementation can be done by anyone (not just us) in a separate repository. |
Hi, are there plans for supporting Azure in addition to GCP and AWS KMS?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: