-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coprocessor: collect output counts for each executor #2607
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ebe13d3
coprocessor: collect output counts for each executor
2a9d0ac
address comment
f8c899f
Merge branch 'master' into output_counts
AndreMouche bd8f82d
address comments
cff0254
Merge branch 'output_counts' of github.com:lamxTyler/tikv into output…
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ pub struct IndexScanExecutor { | |
key_ranges: IntoIter<KeyRange>, | ||
scanner: Option<Scanner>, | ||
unique: bool, | ||
count: i64, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl IndexScanExecutor { | ||
|
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ impl IndexScanExecutor { | |
key_ranges: key_ranges.into_iter(), | ||
scanner: None, | ||
unique: unique, | ||
count: 0, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -86,6 +88,7 @@ impl IndexScanExecutor { | |
key_ranges: key_ranges.into_iter(), | ||
scanner: None, | ||
unique: false, | ||
count: 0, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -145,6 +148,7 @@ impl IndexScanExecutor { | |
|
||
impl Executor for IndexScanExecutor { | ||
fn next(&mut self) -> Result<Option<Row>> { | ||
self.count += 1; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You'd better increase count only when meets some value since we will support stream in the future. |
||
loop { | ||
if let Some(row) = self.get_row_from_range_scanner()? { | ||
return Ok(Some(row)); | ||
|
@@ -170,6 +174,10 @@ impl Executor for IndexScanExecutor { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn collect_output_counts(&mut self, counts: &mut Vec<i64>) { | ||
counts.push(self.count - 1); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You'd better set self.count to zero after collect |
||
} | ||
|
||
fn collect_statistics_into(&mut self, statistics: &mut Statistics) { | ||
statistics.add(&self.statistics); | ||
self.statistics = Statistics::default(); | ||
|
@@ -360,6 +368,10 @@ mod test { | |
} | ||
} | ||
assert!(scanner.next().unwrap().is_none()); | ||
let expected_counts = vec![KEY_NUMBER as i64]; | ||
let mut counts = Vec::with_capacity(1); | ||
scanner.collect_output_counts(&mut counts); | ||
assert_eq!(expected_counts, counts); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[test] | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can simply use a constant number like 4 for capacity.
It doesn't worth a field in context.