-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 401
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
port etcd joint consensus #378
Comments
Does #318 need to be merged first? |
I will send a new PR and do it in a different way. |
I would like to try #10779 |
Thanks @accelsao! I'm already working on it. |
@accelsao Hi, are you interested in porting data driven tests? I have tried to contact you on slack, but it seems you don't check it recently. |
ok, I will try it |
Thanks! You can do it package by package. You can also contact me on slack or github if you have any questions. |
Are there any updates on these issues? I'd be happy to help if there's still something left to do. |
only tests are left
|
We have developed ours implementation but as discussed in the past, we decided to go with the community and port the implement of etcd instead.
There will be several PRs:
The PRs doesn't have to be picked one by one. And we probably sync the code with upstream first.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: