resource_manager: introduce the resource unit model and config

[JmPotato]

Signed-off-by: JmPotato [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #5851.

What is changed and how does it work?

Introduce the resource unit (RU) model and related config.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test

Related changes

• This PR is split from resouce_manager: impl resource controller for tokens client #5811.

Release note

None.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• CabinfeverB
• nolouch

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 75.62% // Head: 75.43% // Decreases project coverage by -0.19% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (7af80a8) compared to base (5573d67).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5862      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.62%   75.43%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files         337      337              
  Lines       34129    34129              
==========================================
- Hits        25810    25745      -65     
- Misses       6111     6158      +47     
- Partials     2208     2226      +18     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.43% <ø> (-0.20%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/errs/errs.go	75.00% <0.00%> (-25.00%)	⬇️
pkg/id/id.go	83.05% <0.00%> (-10.17%)	⬇️
pkg/dashboard/adapter/manager.go	75.86% <0.00%> (-5.75%)	⬇️
server/region_syncer/server.go	81.86% <0.00%> (-5.50%)	⬇️
pkg/election/leadership.go	76.28% <0.00%> (-4.13%)	⬇️
pkg/member/member.go	62.10% <0.00%> (-3.69%)	⬇️
server/tso/allocator_manager.go	64.19% <0.00%> (-3.55%)	⬇️
pkg/storage/kv/etcd_kv.go	72.22% <0.00%> (-3.18%)	⬇️
pkg/utils/etcdutil/etcdutil.go	82.55% <0.00%> (-2.33%)	⬇️
server/schedule/labeler/rules.go	87.50% <0.00%> (-2.28%)	⬇️
... and 15 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[nolouch]

lgtm.

[nolouch]

is it too high?

[JmPotato]

Make sense. Let's keep it a smaller value first. We can adjust it after some tests.

[JmPotato]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: e48b2fc

[ti-chi-bot]

@JmPotato: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.