-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 726
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
scheduler: refactor calcProgressiveRank in hot-scheduler #4950
Conversation
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4950 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.33% 75.31% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 297 297
Lines 29497 29462 -35
==========================================
- Hits 22223 22189 -34
Misses 5332 5332
+ Partials 1942 1941 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rest LGTM
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
// If belong to the case, two dim will be more balanced, the best choice. | ||
if !bs.isTolerance(src, dst, bs.firstPriority) || !bs.isTolerance(src, dst, bs.secondPriority) { | ||
return | ||
} | ||
bs.cur.progressiveRank = -3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how about use enum to replace progressiveRank like -3, -2 , -1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we will add more case in another pr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rest LGTM
/merge |
@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: e1cb31a
|
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 [email protected]
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Ref #4949
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note