tso: merge lastTS and lastArrivalTS into an atomic pointer #1054
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
you06
force-pushed
the
tso/merge-last-ts
branch
from
f07a0cd to
47a2c0b
Compare
|
@JmPotato Please take a look |
JmPotato
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2023
cfzjywxk
reviewed
Nov 14, 2023
Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
you06
added a commit
to you06/client-go
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
* fix the issue that stale timestamp may be a future one Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * add regression test Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * lazy init lastTSO Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * fix panic Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * address comment Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
disksing
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
…1063) Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
you06
added a commit
to you06/client-go
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
* fix the issue that stale timestamp may be a future one Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * add regression test Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * lazy init lastTSO Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * fix panic Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * address comment Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
disksing
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2023
…1064) Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
MyonKeminta
pushed a commit
to MyonKeminta/client-go
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
* fix the issue that stale timestamp may be a future one Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * add regression test Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * lazy init lastTSO Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * fix panic Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> * address comment Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2024
Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: you06 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
close #1053
The update of
lastTSandlastArrivalTSshould be atomic, unless we may get newlateTSwith oldlastArrivalTSwhen callingGetStaleTimestampwhich may lead to a future TSO.This PR merge
lastTSandlastArrivalTSinto an atomic pointer and fix the future stale TSO bug.