ruff: add rules W, I, PIE

[Javagedes]

W: Pycodestyle warnings as ruff failures
I: Requires import statements to be properly sorted
PIE: miscellaneous checks revolving around removing unecessary code

Review the detailed descriptions of each check here: https://beta.ruff.rs/docs/rules/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.02 🎉

Comparison is base (0bd4c2d) 78.65% compared to head (5ce529a) 78.68%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #363      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.65%   78.68%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        6742     6727      -15     
==========================================
- Hits         5303     5293      -10     
+ Misses       1439     1434       -5     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
edk2toollib/uefi/edk2/build_objects/dsc.py	54.11% <ø> (ø)
edk2toollib/uefi/edk2/parsers/dec_parser.py	92.65% <ø> (ø)
edk2toollib/uefi/fmp_capsule_header.py	34.26% <ø> (ø)
edk2toollib/acpi/dmar_parser.py	72.46% <100.00%> (ø)
edk2toollib/acpi/ivrs_parser.py	94.49% <100.00%> (ø)
edk2toollib/gitignore_parser.py	92.96% <100.00%> (ø)
edk2toollib/log/ansi_handler.py	76.11% <100.00%> (ø)
edk2toollib/log/string_handler.py	95.83% <100.00%> (ø)
edk2toollib/tpm/tpm2_policy_calc.py	81.65% <100.00%> (ø)
.../uefi/authenticated_variables_structure_support.py	72.98% <100.00%> (+0.52%)	⬆️
... and 18 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.