Towards non-nice relative number fields

[thofma]

No description provided.

[thofma]

@fieker This only introduces the any_order for relative extensions. It does not fix the maximal order yet.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 76.36% and project coverage change: -0.11% ⚠️

Comparison is base (bb78886) 74.44% compared to head (bd0e035) 74.33%.
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1209      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.44%   74.33%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         346      346              
  Lines      110743   110798      +55     
==========================================
- Hits        82442    82362      -80     
- Misses      28301    28436     +135     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/NumField/NfRel/NfRel.jl	78.55% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️
src/NumField/NfRel/NfRelNS.jl	83.53% <ø> (ø)
src/NumFieldOrd/NfOrd/NfOrd.jl	84.83% <0.00%> (-0.93%)	⬇️
src/NumFieldOrd/NfOrd/Ideal/Prime.jl	82.00% <25.00%> (-0.78%)	⬇️
src/NumField/NfAbs/Elem.jl	68.12% <50.00%> (-0.27%)	⬇️
src/NumFieldOrd/NfRelOrd/NfRelOrd.jl	83.29% <94.44%> (+0.70%)	⬆️
src/NumField/Elem.jl	91.36% <100.00%> (+0.20%)	⬆️
src/NumFieldOrd/NfOrd/ResidueField.jl	88.59% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.