-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ambiguous promote rule for AbsAlgAssElem #419
Comments
I will have a look tomorrow. |
What do you want to do with the polynomials? |
(P.S.: This is not a promote rule problem. It is a problem of too wide signatures and missing promote rules.) |
Nothing, to be honest. I was just playing around until I noticed that polynomials over skew fields are even weirder than I anticipated... |
I see, thanks! Good that you raised this issue. I found some problems. Because we did I will keep it |
(Fixes #419) - AA does not have matrices for noncommutative rings (yet) - We make our algberas/orders subtypes of Ring (to make matrices work) - But we want NCPolynomialRing for polynomials over this ring
(Fixes #419) - AA does not have matrices for noncommutative rings (yet) - We make our algberas/orders subtypes of Ring (to make matrices work) - But we want NCPolynomialRing for polynomials over this ring
(Fixes #419) - AA does not have matrices for noncommutative rings (yet) - We make our algberas/orders subtypes of Ring (to make matrices work) - But we want NCPolynomialRing for polynomials over this ring
Unfortunately, I don't know enough about Oscar promote rules to fix this myself:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: