Exactextract Tutorial

[tm-jc-nacpil]

Adds tutorial for exactextract zonal stats as a new section at the end of the current notebook

So far, I've written the ff.

1. Replicating the same tutorial (adm1, grid AOIs, bing tile AOIs), just with exactextract
2. A simple multiband example

Things I think we could add -- lmk your thoughts on this!

1. Speed test between basic and exactextract functions
2. Weighted statistics (technically supported by exactextract, but I haven't actually tried this yet, see: https://github.com/isciences/exactextract?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-statistics)
3. include_cols and include_geoms params (I think not super needed since it's just changing the output table but not what's calculated)

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[tm-danna-ang]

Things I think we could add -- lmk your thoughts on this!

Hi @tm-jc-nacpil! Lgtm 😄 just wondering why the output wasn't save for Bing Tile Grid Tile AOIs (exactextract).

1. Speed test between basic and exactextract functions

Sounds good! Maybe we can have a separate notebook for the benchmarking.

2. Weighted statistics (technically supported by exactextract, but I haven't actually tried this yet, see: https://github.com/isciences/exactextract?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-statistics)

Not sure if other Geo are using weighted statistics so we can put this on low prio for now unless if you already have a use case for it.

3. include_cols and include_geoms params (I think not super needed since it's just changing the output table but not what's calculated)

You can add a brief note in the tutorial notebook on how to use them or describe sample use cases.

[butchtm]

shouldn't this be a call to rzs.create_exactextract_zonal_stats ?

Reply via ReviewNB

[tm-jc-nacpil]

thanks for the catch! fixed in the latest commit :D

[tm-jc-nacpil]

Latest commit adds the ff.!

• Speed and output result comparisons between exactextract and rasterstats
• Addition of recommendations when to use the rasterstats and exactextract modules
• Examples for using include_cols and include_geom
• Minor bug fix for handling single dict aggregations

[tm-danna-ang]

Line #2.    # Single band

This cell and the next one seem to be both effectively single band with multiple aggregations. You could

1. Remove this cell
2. Call this as Single band with single aggregation and then only use one func

Reply via ReviewNB

[tm-jc-nacpil]

thanks for the catch, makes sense! let's go with number 2 :D

[tm-danna-ang]

You could change the heading to Comparison of exactextract and rasterstats in general since you talk about the recommendations and percent difference later on.

Reply via ReviewNB

[tm-jc-nacpil]

Done in latest commit!

[tm-danna-ang]

The tutorial looks great! 😄 Just have some alternate suggestions for a few parts.

[butchtm]

lgtm!